Blown To Bits

Digital Photographic Extremism

Saturday, September 20th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Individuals buy atrovent online australia who identify as agender are gender nonconforming, but gender nonconforming buy lumigan without prescription people are not necessarily agender. They may be sexually attracted toradol for order to those who identify as male, female, transgender, or other purchase bentyl online agender individuals and gender identities, or they may be asexual. buy sale free pharmacy However, someone who is agender may wish to change their cheapest generic viagra online gender identity at some point, which could mean that they cheapest cephalexin later become genderfluid. There are many ways to support agender cost buy people, such as not assuming anyone's gender upon first meeting, purchase generic allopurinol side effects and alcohol respecting everyone's pronouns and gender identity, and making a safe cheapest prednisolone space for gender nonconforming individuals. For example, a bisexual man atarax cheap price may find both men and women attractive, but their attraction compare cialis prices online may be partially based on gender or sex. While pansexual people.

Digital photography, not the palmtop computer, is my favorite example of the triumph of Moore’s Law. Ten years ago we were still using film and Kodak was still making a lot of money doing it. Black and white ISO 400 film could be pushed up to 3200 if you had to underexpose it, but the results looked terrible. With color film pushed negatives would look even worse, and you needed a custom color lab to do it for you.

Today you can buy a Canon EOS SD Mark II, which has 21.1 million pixels per frame, and ISO up to 25600. Those are numbers beyond the imagination of anyone shooting pictures a decade ago.

Of course, in ten years, after the technology moves on, no one will be impressed.

Comments are closed.