Blown To Bits

Australian Internet Filtering

Friday, October 17th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
While cost compazine essential oils are naturally derived compounds, their concentrated nature can buy cialis cheapest alternatives india pose potential risks when inhaled directly into the lungs. Sore clindamycin gel no prescription throat and ears can occur due to various factors, ranging generic erythromycin from viral or bacterial infections to allergies and acid reflux. order no rx prozac Before starting treatment with Tavalisse, be sure to tell your buy cheap tizanidine doctor if you're pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning for either. Alternatively, mirapex without prescription a person in a violent relationship might flee to escape cheapest diflucan side effects dose in a dissociative fugue, and then later not remember how griseofulvin online they got there. A person with rosacea may want to cheap norvasc no prescription speak with a healthcare professional before using any new products. zoloft cheap price If a person does not receive treatment for gout or celexa prescription pseudogout, they may have an increased risk of experiencing long-term cheap estrace vaginal cream damage to joint tissue. The diagnostic process for Alzheimer's can buy cheap synthroid online help rule out some other potential explanations for a person's symptoms.

Hard on the heels of yesterday’s story about logging all phone calls made, emails sent, and web sites visited in the UK, comes a story about a plan to filter all Internet content in Australia. Users would be able to opt out of the child-friendly level of filtering, but that would only drop you to a level where all illegal content would be filtered.

Problem is, of course, that what’s illegal can’t be determined automatically. Even filters against illegal pornography will inevitably filter much lawful content as well.

And then there is the small problem of encryption. When you make an online purchase using a credit card, no one on the path between your computer and the store’s computer can tell that the data packet being transmitted contains an encrypted credit card number. How could any government filter know that a packet contains illegal pornography (or, in the case of the child-friendly filter, material unsuitable for children)?

What about dirty jokes in obscure foreign languages? What about email discussing illegal acts — does that also qualify as illegal?

Such schemes are absurd, but that does not make them any less scary. There are many more surveillance camera enclosures sold than surveillance cameras. You only have to have people believe they are being watched to change their behavior.

Comments are closed.