This discount griseofulvin combination imitates the natural structure of bone and stimulates bone cafergot prescription growth to help form new bone. It spreads to nearby buy viagra internet areas of the skin and lymph nodes, but at this order atrovent stage, it is not present in other organs. Depending on buy generic celebrex your prescription, this may mean taking one dose in the pyrantel pamoate without prescription morning and evening at the same time each day. The purchase generic viagra best price blocking of potassium channels delays the repolarization of cells, thereby low cost lasix resulting in QT prolongation — a process that slows the buy discount zyprexa without prescription info heart's contractions. Ignoring a person's pronouns can also imply that drug cialis people who are under the transgender umbrella — such as cheap cialis pharmacy those who are transgender, nonbinary, or gender non-conforming — do spiriva for order not exist. This type of bacteria can become a health order zofran concern if it spreads in human-made building water systems. Identifying buy cheap atarax online and avoiding irritants and triggers is a crucial step for preventing.

In a piece I wrote a couple of weeks ago, I talked about the lessons to be drawn from the aftermath of a six-year-old bankruptcy story about United Airlines carelessly posted on a Bloomberg site, comparing it to wacky Internet rumors about the presidential candidates:

With human judgment so eclipsed by responses to atomized, instant data, can there be much doubt that intentional manipulations—of the markets, and of the electorate—should be expected?

Yesterday an anonymous citizen journalist posted to a CNN site that Steve Jobs had been rushed to a hospital after a heart attack, and Apple’s stock dropped 5.4%. The SEC is investigating.

Of course there are morals here. That citizen journalism, the exploitation of millions of eyes and ears through the wonder of Internet connectivity, is a wonderful evolution of journalism, except when it isn’t because any damn fool can say anything and there’s no validation or fact-checking. That instantaneity, much as we love it, sometimes has a big pricetag. And maybe that it’s worth asking whether the law protecting CNN in this case (it bears no responsibility for the anonymous poster’s falsehood) may be a little too generous.

But mostly what I’m thinking is that it didn’t take long for one of my predictions to come true. The other one, about the opportunity to manipulate the election by spreading a last-minute rumor, wouldn’t be timely quite yet. But I’ll bet there are people thinking about how to pull it off.

This entry was posted on Saturday, October 4th, 2008 at 8:38 am and is filed under The Internet and the Web, What is information?. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.