"We've cheapest estradiol valerate known that a high fat diet, along with a diet buy cheap erythromycin online high in red meat, tends to increase the risk of generic pyrantel pamoate colon polyp formation and colon cancer," Dr. Jesse P. Houghton, cheap alesse (ovral l) a senior medical director of gastroenterology at the Southern Ohio order flagyl Medical Center, told MNT. Other factors include the patient's genetic buy diflucan from india makeup and how the patient utilizes and breaks down vitamin order cheap 60 sale dosage D," said Dr. Michael F. Holick, a professor of medicine, purchase lasix online pharmacology, physiology and biophysics as well as a molecular medicine buy cheap t-ject 60 at Boston University's Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, in buy from canada a related commentary. The NHS explains that certain types of buy asacol bowel polyps, called adenomas, have a small risk of becoming purchase online overnight delivery cancerous. Hyperplastic polyps in the colon are unlikely to become cheap generic asacol cancerous, but some doctors may still suggest removing them. Doctors order cheapest ampicillin dose will generally perform a colonoscopy to remove a polyp, which buy cheap atenolol online they may be able to do in the same procedure as.

Siva Vaidhyanathan has a good summary of the deal, in the details of which may lie the devil. Like me, he regrets that we won’t now get any clarification on the limits of fair use in the digital age — though he thinks Google would have lost, which would have been a disaster since it would have strengthened the hand of the content industry to keep cracking down on people using small amounts of material for commentary or indexing.

He notes that as long as we rely on Google book search, it’s better for us if it works better. And it will work better — Google will be free to show larger excerpts from copyrighted works. But the deal also will firm up Google’s status as the dominant digital book depository. And in light of the anti-trust issue that raises, Siva notes an interesting coincidence: Google CEO Eric Schmidt hit the road campaigning for Barack Obama last week, just at the moment when the parties must have been hammering out the final draft of this agreement.

And finally, he cautions us not to get too excited about the deal until the court has approved it.

In a related development, Harvard has announced that its library won’t be extending its cooperation with Google to its collection of in-copyright materials, because the deal places too many restrictions on the ways in which they would be made available. Google has been digitizing only the out-of-copyright works in Harvard’s collection, though apparently Harvard’s position has been that Google’s entire project was legal. Not clear to me that Harvard’s decision poses any great problems for Google, since there tend to be multiple sources for copyrighted works.

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 30th, 2008 at 9:00 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.