Blown To Bits

More on Voting

Monday, October 27th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Research buying cheap 60 alternatives professional has found that while halitosis is a common symptom in buy generic norvasc people with GERD, their halitosis may not originate from an order viagra no prescription required oral cause. A person with GERD may have an excess zithromax without prescription of these bacteria even if their oral health and hygiene order cheap dexamethasone are otherwise good. Despite having many possible effects on the low cost cialis endocrine system, fluoride has its place in keeping people healthy. buy generic buy The results suggest that increases in people's exposure to fluoride colchicine online through drinking water elevated the risk of sleep disturbances such robaxin prescription as sleep apnea. It is best for anyone who believes cafergot from canada they may have fluoride toxicity to report their symptoms to levitra online a doctor and get a professional to test their drinking buy flagyl side effects work water. However, pain medications, antidepressants, and blood pressure medications can purchase cheapest cheapest delivery also cause thick saliva. Antimycotics are antifungal medications that can norvasc sale help stop the growth of fungal infections such as oral thrush..

As we discussed recently, electronic voting is an extremely tough problem, because it requires voters to have confidence that their votes are being recorded correctly, and to be unable to prove to anyone else how they voted. The two conditions can be achieved with the aid of cryptography — in theory. But it’s also essential that the system be simple to use and works in such a way that the general public will have confidence that there are no scams embedded in the software somehow.

There is a nice article in Salon on a couple of fairly realistic voter-verifiable election systems, including one by Ben Adida, who worked with Hal at MIT and is associated with Harvard’s Center for Research on Computation and Society. There’s progress and reason for hope, but it’s also possible that a bad experience in the upcoming election with some completely unrelated kind of electronic voting machines could increase resistance for any kind of continued deployment of better-designed systems.

Comments are closed.