The atrovent for order absence of warnings or other information for a given drug erythromycin online does not indicate that the drug or drug combination is aldactone canada safe, effective, or appropriate for all patients or all specific buy cialis once daily uses. For example, a white American citizen feeling resentful toward order allopurinol no prescription white immigrants, solely due to a belief they are stealing atarax us local jobs, is an example of xenophobia on its own. buy free vibramycin no prescription dosage Osteoporosis does not have a current cure, but a variety atarax prescription of medications can help protect and strengthen a person's bones. cialis online sales They should also ask the doctor about the suitability of buy t-ject 60 online other treatments for UTIs, which include antibiotics and cranberry juice. dangers cheapest clozapine get FillersDermatologists may recommend fillers in the hands of people who cheap viagra from uk have a loss of plumpness or firmness in these areas. order augmentin Treatments for late onset Alzheimer's disease may help slow the progression.

As we discussed recently, electronic voting is an extremely tough problem, because it requires voters to have confidence that their votes are being recorded correctly, and to be unable to prove to anyone else how they voted. The two conditions can be achieved with the aid of cryptography — in theory. But it’s also essential that the system be simple to use and works in such a way that the general public will have confidence that there are no scams embedded in the software somehow.

There is a nice article in Salon on a couple of fairly realistic voter-verifiable election systems, including one by Ben Adida, who worked with Hal at MIT and is associated with Harvard’s Center for Research on Computation and Society. There’s progress and reason for hope, but it’s also possible that a bad experience in the upcoming election with some completely unrelated kind of electronic voting machines could increase resistance for any kind of continued deployment of better-designed systems.

This entry was posted on Monday, October 27th, 2008 at 10:35 am and is filed under Secrecy and encryption, Security. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.