Blown To Bits

More on Voting

Monday, October 27th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
If buy discount cialis you're interested in bodybuilding, talk with your doctor about ways betnovate cheap to safely achieve your goals. What you can doIf you atrovent experience hair loss while taking allopurinol, talk with your doctor atarax sale about it. It is also important to note that different buy lumigan without prescription types of chocolate have varying amounts of cocoa content, and tizanidine malaysia some may be high in sugar and saturated fat, which buy nexium may contribute to inflammation. Talk with your doctor or pharmacist, compare cialis prices online who can provide personalized guidance about cost issues related to buy diclofenac online cheap Amjevita. Doctors typically won't prescribe Saxenda for people with certain cheap cialis pill factors that increase the risk of thyroid cancer. Keep in cheap generic glyburide mind that the following information does not include all other generic celexa sale dangers possible interactions with Calquence. If a person notices new symptoms, such.

As we discussed recently, electronic voting is an extremely tough problem, because it requires voters to have confidence that their votes are being recorded correctly, and to be unable to prove to anyone else how they voted. The two conditions can be achieved with the aid of cryptography — in theory. But it’s also essential that the system be simple to use and works in such a way that the general public will have confidence that there are no scams embedded in the software somehow.

There is a nice article in Salon on a couple of fairly realistic voter-verifiable election systems, including one by Ben Adida, who worked with Hal at MIT and is associated with Harvard’s Center for Research on Computation and Society. There’s progress and reason for hope, but it’s also possible that a bad experience in the upcoming election with some completely unrelated kind of electronic voting machines could increase resistance for any kind of continued deployment of better-designed systems.

Comments are closed.