Cancer buy cheap compazine online canada often occurs when the second, non-mutated copy of the gene cialis online sale occurs during a person's lifetime. Different sutures require different care, discount kenalog so getting clear guidance from the person who applied them buy cheap (ovral side effects liquid is important. People with PsA need to exercise caution around cafergot pills flu infections and seek prompt medical attention if they show buy allopurinol without prescription signs of the flu. OCD cleaning compulsions tend to be zithromax in uk excessive, take up too much time, and negatively affect a cheap viagra overnight delivery person's life. A person should speak with a doctor about retin-a without prescription any unusual or persistent rash that appears without a known buying kenalog online cause. Undigested carbohydrates then pass to the large intestine, where buy free norvasc best price jelly bacteria break them down, creating gas. Research shows they may viagra non prescription increase a person's blood clot risk even more than their first-.

Yesterday we blogged about the request by the McCain-Palin campaign that YouTube respond to takedown notices less automatically. YouTube has responded in the negative, stating (as I did) that the problem is the law, not YouTube’s manner of dealing with the opposing parties. Here is YouTube’s response; I find it pretty reasonable. The Electronic Frontier Foundation wishes YouTube would show a bit more willingness to ignore obviously spurious takedown notices, e.g. ones where the contested material is a few seconds of a news show.

An interesting question is whether political campaign ads should get some special treatment. McCain’s campaign argues that because of the time sensitivity of campaigns and the importance of the free flow of information to the electorate, there should be a higher standard for taking down a campaign ad. YouTube doesn’t agree. Neither does Chris Soghoian in a well-argued, passionate post: Stand in line, he tells McCain, along with all the other people who are being abused by inappropriate DMCA takedowns.

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 16th, 2008 at 7:19 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.