Because cost lasix phentermine is a stimulant, and stimulants are potentially harmful to griseofulvin prescription infants and young children, people should generally not take it buy serevent online while nursing. If you have a high blood level of tetracycline online stores potassium, your doctor will likely manage it before prescribing Aldactone. order discount cialis They can simply apologize and correct themselves, gently encourage others tizanidine for sale to use the correct pronouns, and work toward getting it discount zoloft right in the future. They will be able to advise buy cheap celexa online on how to start exercising safely and may be able ventolin online review to help plan a routine. In some cases, a leaky find cheap viagra heart valve can be a relatively minor, benign condition that triamterene for order does not require treatment. Therefore, tailoring vaccine messaging to specific order discount kenalog online populations is a key part of equitable distribution. Sexual harassment is.

Yesterday we blogged about the request by the McCain-Palin campaign that YouTube respond to takedown notices less automatically. YouTube has responded in the negative, stating (as I did) that the problem is the law, not YouTube’s manner of dealing with the opposing parties. Here is YouTube’s response; I find it pretty reasonable. The Electronic Frontier Foundation wishes YouTube would show a bit more willingness to ignore obviously spurious takedown notices, e.g. ones where the contested material is a few seconds of a news show.

An interesting question is whether political campaign ads should get some special treatment. McCain’s campaign argues that because of the time sensitivity of campaigns and the importance of the free flow of information to the electorate, there should be a higher standard for taking down a campaign ad. YouTube doesn’t agree. Neither does Chris Soghoian in a well-argued, passionate post: Stand in line, he tells McCain, along with all the other people who are being abused by inappropriate DMCA takedowns.

This entry was posted on Thursday, October 16th, 2008 at 7:19 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.