Blown To Bits

YouTube Responds to McCain

Thursday, October 16th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
People discount azor no rx may also need to avoid eating or drinking for a toradol few hours before the scan, especially if using a contrast cheap (ovral price dangers dye. The technologist will position a person appropriately before leaving nasonex no online prescription the room to avoid radiation exposure. Cystoscopy is a direct canada gel visualization procedure, where a doctor inserts a thin, flexible tube where to buy cialis with a camera — cystoscope — through the urethra into purchase clomid online the bladder. While cystoscopy with a biopsy is the most purchase cheap buy sale overdose accurate method for diagnosing bladder cancer, other imaging tests, such order cipro from canada as CT scans, MRI, or ultrasound, can also provide valuable metronidazole gel for order information about the size, location, and possible spread of the buy cheap tizanidine tumor. Jesduvroq is a brand-name oral tablet that's prescribed for amoxicillin for sale anemia caused by chronic kidney disease. Your doctor will check viagra india your Hgb levels regularly during Jesduvroq treatment and adjust your diclofenac canada dosage as needed. If you would like to notify the discount information FDA about a side effect you've had with Jesduvroq, you can.

Yesterday we blogged about the request by the McCain-Palin campaign that YouTube respond to takedown notices less automatically. YouTube has responded in the negative, stating (as I did) that the problem is the law, not YouTube’s manner of dealing with the opposing parties. Here is YouTube’s response; I find it pretty reasonable. The Electronic Frontier Foundation wishes YouTube would show a bit more willingness to ignore obviously spurious takedown notices, e.g. ones where the contested material is a few seconds of a news show.

An interesting question is whether political campaign ads should get some special treatment. McCain’s campaign argues that because of the time sensitivity of campaigns and the importance of the free flow of information to the electorate, there should be a higher standard for taking down a campaign ad. YouTube doesn’t agree. Neither does Chris Soghoian in a well-argued, passionate post: Stand in line, he tells McCain, along with all the other people who are being abused by inappropriate DMCA takedowns.

Comments are closed.