They buy generic robaxin alternative liquid can detect heart attacks as they are happening by picking zyprexa no prescription up on abnormalities in ventricle depolarization and repolarization. Therefore, a methotrexate no prescription doctor might suggest that people do not change their medication buy cheap clonidine regimen before the colder months to ensure they have good purchase cheap cialis sale dangers control over their condition. Research indicates that donors often feel purchase generic zithromax best price that donating affects their employment and health insurance and is discount quinine overnight delivery more expensive than expected. Riding a bike for exercise requires buy cheap cephalexin online setting the resistance on a road bike or a stationary zoloft canada bike to be sufficiently challenging to raise the heart rate. dangers cheapest gel get The best way to poop instantly is to visit the bathroom.

In a new low for abuse of copyright, Toyota has demanded that a site providing desktop backgrounds remove all images that contain a Toyota, Scion, or Lexus, even in a photography whose copyright is properly held by a third party. The site asked Toyota to identify which images in particular needed to be removed, and Toyota responded that if they had to go to the trouble of identifying what they were objecting to, they would have to be paid for their work.

What’s interesting about this case is what is being used is not the DMCA, but the threat of DMCA. To issue a DMCA takedown, Toyota would have to be specific. The company is apparently claiming that no one can use a photo in which one of their cars appears without infringing their copyright on the design of the car. Extraordinary (and stupid — don’t they want the free publicity of Toyota cars on desktops?).

Also, Professor Charles Nesson has been getting great publicity for his attempt to have the DMCA ruled unconstitutional, essentially because it is a criminal statute dressed up in civil garb. The penalties are extraordinarily high, and none of the protections available to criminal defendants are accorded to those the recording industry comes after. That is why so few cases make it to trial, and the industry can continue its attacks unabated by any risk of losing a case.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 11:16 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.