If order cephalexin they have significant quantities of alcohol in their system, their get cheap flagyl best price tablet heart may be under extra stress. Autoimmune cells are proteins generic colchicine prescription professional the immune system creates that attack healthy cells, such as buy ampicillin those in bone. The severity of heart attacks can differ discount pyrantel pamoate between people, as some individuals experience severe pain while others amikacin canada only notice slight discomfort. The limited body of available evidence buy dexamethasone pills suggests that phentermine may increase the risk of complications, such discount nexium as cleft palate and other birth defects. "The investment of buy cheap ventolin online surgeons in developing their skills, investment from hospitals in developing aldactone buy online high quality teams, and investment from companies like Ethicon in the.

In a new low for abuse of copyright, Toyota has demanded that a site providing desktop backgrounds remove all images that contain a Toyota, Scion, or Lexus, even in a photography whose copyright is properly held by a third party. The site asked Toyota to identify which images in particular needed to be removed, and Toyota responded that if they had to go to the trouble of identifying what they were objecting to, they would have to be paid for their work.

What’s interesting about this case is what is being used is not the DMCA, but the threat of DMCA. To issue a DMCA takedown, Toyota would have to be specific. The company is apparently claiming that no one can use a photo in which one of their cars appears without infringing their copyright on the design of the car. Extraordinary (and stupid — don’t they want the free publicity of Toyota cars on desktops?).

Also, Professor Charles Nesson has been getting great publicity for his attempt to have the DMCA ruled unconstitutional, essentially because it is a criminal statute dressed up in civil garb. The penalties are extraordinarily high, and none of the protections available to criminal defendants are accorded to those the recording industry comes after. That is why so few cases make it to trial, and the industry can continue its attacks unabated by any risk of losing a case.

This entry was posted on Monday, November 17th, 2008 at 11:16 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.