People cheap tetracycline will need to follow specific instructions from a doctor to free cialis online order prepare for laser cataract surgery. Here's information about the generic discount cipro status for Ozempic and Mounjaro, as well as details on cheapest cialis their active ingredients. However, if the side effects last longer norvasc without prescription than that, bother you, or become severe, be sure to certified betnovate talk with your doctor or pharmacist. A person should speak buy generic norvasc with a doctor if they notice any symptoms of shingles buy tetracycline low cheap price or any pain after the shingles rash heals. Home adaptations generic cialis no prescription jelly may also be necessary to help the person recovering from cialis free delivery a stroke maintain as much independence as possible. The first kenalog overdose online purchase free "zombie" had catatonic schizophrenia, a rare condition that makes the buy generic cialis no prescription usa person act as though they are walking in a stupor. cheap clomid pill Medical News Today has made every effort to make certain purchase methotrexate price work that all information is factually correct, comprehensive, and up to buy generic viagra online date. To learn about other mild side effects, talk with your.

For years, people have been observing that the wonderful surfeit of information sources available through the Web can result, paradoxically, in a narrowing of our perspectives. In the political realm, for example, liberals can now get all their news from liberal sites, and conservatives from conservative sites. As Cass Sunstein observes in Infotopia, speaking and listening only to people who think like us has a polarizing force — everyone just gets more extreme.

The Boston Globe has a good review today of a paper published in Science some months ago reporting that groupthink is affecting even scientific research publications — the lists of cited papers are becoming more homogeneous, not more varied, as the information sources diversify. There is even an analogy with popular music — yes, there is a “long tail” of music now available for special tastes, but the small number of big winners dominate music sales now more than ever. And so it is with scientific papers — with most available online, a smaller number are cited more often than in the past.

The paper suggests that Web search is fundamentally different from search through paper records, which puts more context around sources and causes us to be more critical before pursuing a reference. Clicking on links thoughtlessly is just too easy, and we are losing something in the process.

Hardly an open-and-shut case — the article mentions several dissents — but it makes sense to me.

This entry was posted on Sunday, November 23rd, 2008 at 3:57 pm and is filed under Miscellaneous, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.