Additionally, dangers cheapest advair get inflammation around the joints causes surrounding muscles to tighten, leading augmentin cheap drug to more pain and stiffness. Metastatic prostate cancer is cancer zyprexa alternative that has spread from a person's prostate to other parts order prednisolone cheap online of their body. SHOP NOW AT RO These prenatal multivitamins find discount viagra online are suitable while trying to conceive and during pregnancy. Other low cost cialis factors may also influence the development of prostate cancer, although viagra us it is unclear exactly how. People with kidney failure who cheapest viagra online are taking statins should receive regular follow-ups from their doctor cheap cialis pharmacy to monitor their kidney health. A prion is a type serevent vendors of protein with an abnormal structure, and it passes this cheapest cephalexin abnormality on to other proteins. It also found that inflammation accutane online stores in adipose (fat) tissue might play a role in the accutane sales development of endometriosis. Instead, ocular surface staining involves applying dye buy generic ventolin to the outer portion of the eye during nonsurgical procedures, buy levitra online such as when testing for dry eye or small eye injuries..

For years, people have been observing that the wonderful surfeit of information sources available through the Web can result, paradoxically, in a narrowing of our perspectives. In the political realm, for example, liberals can now get all their news from liberal sites, and conservatives from conservative sites. As Cass Sunstein observes in Infotopia, speaking and listening only to people who think like us has a polarizing force — everyone just gets more extreme.

The Boston Globe has a good review today of a paper published in Science some months ago reporting that groupthink is affecting even scientific research publications — the lists of cited papers are becoming more homogeneous, not more varied, as the information sources diversify. There is even an analogy with popular music — yes, there is a “long tail” of music now available for special tastes, but the small number of big winners dominate music sales now more than ever. And so it is with scientific papers — with most available online, a smaller number are cited more often than in the past.

The paper suggests that Web search is fundamentally different from search through paper records, which puts more context around sources and causes us to be more critical before pursuing a reference. Clicking on links thoughtlessly is just too easy, and we are losing something in the process.

Hardly an open-and-shut case — the article mentions several dissents — but it makes sense to me.

This entry was posted on Sunday, November 23rd, 2008 at 3:57 pm and is filed under Miscellaneous, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.