This zoloft helps prevent others, including children and pets, from taking the order cialis from canada drug by accident or harming themselves with the needle. The find discount viagra drug information contained herein is subject to change and is bentyl online not intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, cheapest estradiol valerate drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. Doctors do not diovan sale consider UC a life threatening condition, and life expectancy is celexa online stores typical for most individuals. When a person receives a diagnosis order cheapest buy low cost dosage at early onset, symptoms are typically more severe, with more best price order inflammation across the body. Although scientists have developed several treatment generic mirapex options for UC, research on new treatments continues. For instance, buy buy canada if the individual were their own donor, doctors would need buy amoxicillin to collect stem cells from somewhere in their body. Currently, order free for alternative withdrawal there is insufficient data to inform the effective use of stem.

Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”

I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?

Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.