The buy generic allopurinol side effects immune attack causes inflammation, which erodes the myelin sheath and cheap compazine internet may damage the underlying nerves. MS is an autoimmune disease buy generic compazine where immune cells attack nerve cells in the brain and buy free azor no prescription dosage spinal cord, including those in the brain. However, it is buy generic diclofenac important to note that a healthcare professional can only make order buy lowest dosage cheapest price a diagnosis of MS if a person has more than cheap australia one episode. Visit our dedicated hub for more research-backed information discount mirapex and in-depth resources on multiple sclerosis (MS). Scientists have long buy methotrexate without prescription theorized that EBV might be involved in the development of buy cialis internet myalgic encephalitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Initially, people with CAEBV experience cialis no prescription the usual symptoms of mononucleosis, but they do not recover. buy cheapest viagra They work by targeting immune cells to reduce their number and.

Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”

I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?

Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.