However, buying cialis online this article should not be used as a substitute for flovent cheapest price the knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. To free gel online order differentiate them, a doctor may need to perform some tests, cheap erythromycin pharmacy such as imaging or assessing symptoms. In people with hypertension, purchase viagra overnight delivery the blood pressure does not always decrease as far as cheap cialis no rx it should, and in some cases, it increases. Choose nonacidic get cheapest spiriva low price canada adhesives and removable captions so family members can remove and augmentin online stores add information to the captions once their loved ones pass sale viagra on. A healthcare proxy takes effect when a doctor determines get cheap tizanidine online effects that the person cannot make their own healthcare decisions. While cheapest azor the current paper did not look at the mechanisms behind asacol no rx required the link between obesity and sex to blood cancers, researchers order lumigan no rx suggested that a mechanism called mutation-driven clonal hematopoiesis could be behind.

Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”

I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?

Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.