To petcam (metacam) oral suspension online be most effective, a person should take KI before or generic buy side effects and alcohol shortly after exposure to radioactive iodine. If an oral KI cialis no rx required solution is not available, the FDA advises people can make find discount (metacam) an oral solution at home using KI tablets. Additionally, iodized order gentamicin eye drops table salt does not contain sufficient concentrations of iodine to no rx bentyl block the uptake of radioactive iodine. It uses high-energy beams remeron online of particles, or waves, to destroy cancer cells and reduce atarax vendors the size of tumors. Evidence notes that CyberKnife is an cialis buy drug effective treatment for cancer and can help with prostate cancer levitra pharmacy treatment. Doctors will also create a mold of the person's buy free amikacin prescription body that supports them in a position that maximizes the effectiveness.

Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”

I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?

Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?

This entry was posted on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.