"Open
buy serevent us communication and commitment to the relationship often can manage common
buy kenalog issues," says Cooper. Gender dysphoria is a condition that describes
order prozac the discomfort a person feels when their sex assigned at
no prescription cialis birth does not align with their gender identity. A person
canadian pharmacy viagra who has gout may wish to limit or avoid alcohol,
buy cheapest quinine on line particularly if they are experiencing a gout flare. The drug
purchase cheapest compazine no prescription tablets information contained herein is subject to change and is not
t-ject 60 no prescription intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug
diclofenac no prescription interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. Many of these behaviors,
(metacam) alternative such as rocking or needing a comfort object, are ways
buy generic aldactone online that children try to soothe themselves when upset or how
buy remeron without prescription children react when they are scared or angry. Medical professionals
buy cheapest viagra on line developed apixaban to help prevent stroke and blood clots in people.
Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”
I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?
Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?
This entry was posted
on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.