Blown To Bits

JuicyCampus Blocked at Two Universities

Thursday, November 20th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
Once viagra generic an allergist/immunologist diagnoses an underlying condition, they can plan the purchase viagra without prescription best course of action. Lassa fever can also be passed cheap azor no rx between patients and staff at poorly equipped hospitals where sterilization buy diovan online and protective clothing is not standard. Proprioception changes in dementia petcam (metacam) oral suspension for sale lead to complications that significantly affect the daily life and erythromycin prescription well-being of affected individuals. Part of a self-care strategy is clozapine prescription tracking and monitoring moods to identify warning signs of an buy cheapest serevent alternative episode. If flare-ups become severe, persistent, or show signs of advair without prescription infection, it is essential to consult a dermatologist promptly. Symptoms vibramycin tablet are more prominent in the lower body and can include order discount pamoate online effects wide-based walking, a shuffling or freezing gait, and falls. Once buy generic cafergot cost professional a person with Social Security disability benefits meets the time viagra overnight frame requirement, they should receive their Medicare card in the mail..

Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”

I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?

Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?

Comments are closed.