Once
viagra generic an allergist/immunologist diagnoses an underlying condition, they can plan the
purchase viagra without prescription best course of action. Lassa fever can also be passed
cheap azor no rx between patients and staff at poorly equipped hospitals where sterilization
buy diovan online and protective clothing is not standard. Proprioception changes in dementia
petcam (metacam) oral suspension for sale lead to complications that significantly affect the daily life and
erythromycin prescription well-being of affected individuals. Part of a self-care strategy is
clozapine prescription tracking and monitoring moods to identify warning signs of an
buy cheapest serevent alternative episode. If flare-ups become severe, persistent, or show signs of
advair without prescription infection, it is essential to consult a dermatologist promptly. Symptoms
vibramycin tablet are more prominent in the lower body and can include
order discount pamoate online effects wide-based walking, a shuffling or freezing gait, and falls. Once
buy generic cafergot cost professional a person with Social Security disability benefits meets the time
viagra overnight frame requirement, they should receive their Medicare card in the mail..
Tennessee State University and Hampton University, two historically black institutions, are blocking students’ access to JuicyCampus.com, the leading site for vicious, anonymous gossip about (the sex lives of) college students. The administrators who made the decision cite the Virginia Tech tragedy. One said, “We need to be more thoughtful, and we really need to be more careful in targeting and attacking each other.”
I understand the impulse, but limiting what speech reaches a college campus is not a good idea. The arguments are hard to sustain. The administrator goes on to say, “¬†JuicyCampus gossip blog does not fit with the legacy, spirit, and reputation of Tennessee State University.” Surely true — so will he remove from the libraries works that do not meet that standard? Or filter students’ email to make sure their communications are fitting?
Of course, a blog is not exactly a book and not exactly an email, but can we define the ways in which it’s different that would justify a different standard?
This entry was posted
on Thursday, November 20th, 2008 at 10:29 am and is filed under Censorship and free speech.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.