Search Engine Filtering in Argentina
Thursday, November 13th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
The buy atarax online FDA stated that the information available didn't show Avastin to buy celexa online be safe and effective in treating breast cancer. Some clinical asacol sale studies that looked at Avastin as a breast cancer treatment purchase sale best price professional found that the drug offers some benefit. Avastin for endometrial price of cheapest cancerAvastin isn't FDA-approved to treat endometrial cancer, but sometimes it's lipitor prescription used off-label for this condition. Although there isn't a generic cheap retin-a form of bevacizumab, there are biosimilar forms available called Alymsys, discount 60 side effects usa Mvasi, Vegzelma, and Zirabev. They'll recommend ways to manage your buy generic triamterene blood pressure, which may include using medications called antihypertensives. For lipitor prescription example, blurry vision can be a symptom of high blood cheapest methotrexate pressure, including severe high blood pressure. It isn't known whether lumigan prescription Avastin is effective for treating liver cancer in people who discount diclofenac no rx have had bleeding caused by varices. Off-label use is when a.
Chris Soghoian has a fascinating article about filtering of search engine results in Argentina. This is different from what we write about that happens in China, where the lens is distorted. In Argentina, if you search for certain people using Yahoo!, you get back nothing at all. And it’s not because of official government policy; it’s because of private litigation. Someone simply goes to court and asks the judge to make them disappear, the judge enjoins the search engine company, and disappear they do. Google responds differently than Yahoo!, and there are many easy workarounds for those who experiment, but it seems to be a great leap forward in treating search engines just as a manipulable tool, not a public utility.