Search Engine Filtering in Argentina
Thursday, November 13th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
A celexa prescription standard treatment for pain is the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory order clindamycin gel drugs (NSAIDs), such as ibuprofen. However, these are small studies, quinine online stores and conducting them for longer periods is necessary for more cialis prescription conclusive results. Spondylolisthesis is when a vertebra in the spine generic accutane sale dangers slips out of place, causing pain or other symptoms related generic atenolol to the nerves, such as tingling in the back. Some buy bentyl online types of Medicare Advantage plans may not offer Part D get discount (ovral coverage, so a person should compare plans before enrollment. Among augmentin for order them, acetaminophen is one of the most commonly available pain-relieving cialis cheap price and fever-reducing medications available. These drugs can treat an acute buy nexium online psychotic episode, including delusions and hallucinations, lasting for a short buy clonidine online period, and support long-term management of symptoms. Before starting Jatenzo, order flagyl talk with your doctor about your heart health and any heart.
Chris Soghoian has a fascinating article about filtering of search engine results in Argentina. This is different from what we write about that happens in China, where the lens is distorted. In Argentina, if you search for certain people using Yahoo!, you get back nothing at all. And it’s not because of official government policy; it’s because of private litigation. Someone simply goes to court and asks the judge to make them disappear, the judge enjoins the search engine company, and disappear they do. Google responds differently than Yahoo!, and there are many easy workarounds for those who experiment, but it seems to be a great leap forward in treating search engines just as a manipulable tool, not a public utility.