If get cheap buy best price tablet you're sexually active and you or your partner can become buy online sales pregnant, talk with your doctor about your birth control needs canada cheap while you're using Botox. For OAB and urinary incontinence caused buy atarax by a nerve disorder, Botox is injected into the detrusor purchase cheap buy online canada muscle of the bladder. The dosage of Botox for cervical buy order no prescription sample dystonia depends on the severity of the condition, level of cialis side effects pain it's causing, and muscles affected. Your child's doctor will best sale start your child's treatment with the lowest recommended Botox dosage asacol online stores for spasticity. If you and your doctor determine that Botox spiriva for sale is safe and effective for you, you'll likely use the gentamicin eye drops online drug long term for most conditions. However, in people who best price viagra used Botox for overactive bladder (OAB),* certain side effects were buy atrovent without prescription more common in older people than in younger people. Botox vs..

In a development that bears a family resemblance to the deal Google cut with the book publishing industry, Myspace has reached an agreement with one big part of the entertainment industry. Its users will be allowed to continue posting video clips from the Colbert Report and other TV shows without anyone getting hassled with DMCA takedown demands.

When the user posts a video, third-party software will identify it automatically, and place a visual tag on the clip, at the bottom of the screen. Advertising will be posted and the viewer will be given the opportunity to buy the whole episode. The revenue from the advertising and episode purchases will be split up among Viacom, Myspace, and the company that makes the software that identifies the videos. Everybody makes a little money (except, of course, the people who are doing the posting and the people who are doing the viewing!).

This deal is narrow — it affects only MySpace and Viacom. Google’s deal is broader — it is a deal with the group that represents publishers and authors — but the court hasn’t approved it yet. And of course, it covers only Google, not anyone else who might like to create a book search service. Do these deals show the outline of a more encompassing, public solution to the problems with DMCA and the Internet?

This entry was posted on Monday, November 3rd, 2008 at 10:02 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright, Social computing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.