The generic clonidine ACS provides some useful information about the many diagnostic tools cheapest acomplia that are relevant to ovarian cancer. Ultimately, prospective students should cost cialis consider the school and curriculum to determine which one best purchase cheap erythromycin online canada suits them. These milestones can make it difficult for them fda approved viagra to settle down and relax at bedtime, leading to sleep buy diflucan internet regression. Depending on the medication a person uses, they may allopurinol cheap price use the nebulizer once or multiple times throughout the day. cheapest nexium More trials are necessary to confirm if asthma can reliably viagra vendors help larger groups of people with asthma. There are many order free acomplia alternative withdrawal types of helminths, such as hookworm and whipworm, that can order mirapex no rx cause a variety of illnesses. Lack of sleep can eventually celexa non prescription lead to mood swings, irritability, depression, an undermined immune system, and.

In a development that bears a family resemblance to the deal Google cut with the book publishing industry, Myspace has reached an agreement with one big part of the entertainment industry. Its users will be allowed to continue posting video clips from the Colbert Report and other TV shows without anyone getting hassled with DMCA takedown demands.

When the user posts a video, third-party software will identify it automatically, and place a visual tag on the clip, at the bottom of the screen. Advertising will be posted and the viewer will be given the opportunity to buy the whole episode. The revenue from the advertising and episode purchases will be split up among Viacom, Myspace, and the company that makes the software that identifies the videos. Everybody makes a little money (except, of course, the people who are doing the posting and the people who are doing the viewing!).

This deal is narrow — it affects only MySpace and Viacom. Google’s deal is broader — it is a deal with the group that represents publishers and authors — but the court hasn’t approved it yet. And of course, it covers only Google, not anyone else who might like to create a book search service. Do these deals show the outline of a more encompassing, public solution to the problems with DMCA and the Internet?

This entry was posted on Monday, November 3rd, 2008 at 10:02 am and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright, Social computing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.