Blown To Bits

A Political Revolution, or Modern Tools for Old Politics?

Friday, December 26th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
The discount accutane AAD claims that if someone is acne-prone, they should avoid drug lasix online purchase putting petroleum jelly on their face, as it may lead compare diclofenac prices online to breakouts in some people. The kit to collect the betnovate no prescription sample will typically contain instructions to help an individual collect order lasix in canada a suitable sample. A person's samples may undergo one or buy acomplia online more of the following tests to diagnose AML or determine buy discount lipitor without prescription info their AML subtype. Some people may experience lasting symptoms, such find cialis on internet as mildly reduced movement or a small area of paralysis. get discount (metacam) Regular heart health checkups may be beneficial if someone has best price advair heart disease risk factors, such as advanced age or smoking, cialis side effects or has a family history of heart failure. If an IUD.

Since Obama’s victory, an interesting debate has been going on about whether he really tapped the collective energies of Internet users in a collaborative way, or whether the Internet that was just a tool he used to conduct a very effective but fundamentally top-down campaign. There was a conference at the Berkman Center to discuss this and related questions; Yochai Benkler is eloquent in this video taking exception to the way Marshall Ganz had described Obama’s use of the Internet as an organizing tool. Some succinct essays surrounding these issues appear on the Berkman Center site here.

There’s an interesting short article in the Takoma (WA) News Tribune today entitled “Is Obama’s Web-based political revolution real or an illusion?” (It came to my attention because my wife, Marlyn McGrath, was quoted on the subject of how long it takes to read a college application — a number the reporter thought relevant since Obama has received 300,000 online applications for jobs in his administration. Also quoted is Professor Lillian Lee of Cornell, a Harvard PhD who used to be a teaching assistant for me — Lillian notes that the popularity metric used by the change.gov site for allowing certain posts to move up in the list is actually not awfully democratic in practice.)

Obama is trying lots of things, and that’s great. He probably could have been elected without the Internet, though it surely did him no harm to have collected millions of cell phone numbers on the promise that you’d be texted in the middle of the night about his VP pick, and a free “Go! Go! Go! Obama!” ring tone. Figuring out what actually works will take longer.

Comments are closed.