Blown To Bits

A Political Revolution, or Modern Tools for Old Politics?

Friday, December 26th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
It cheap find internet is important for them also to seek treatment for these generic online sale information conditions and learn techniques to manage anxiety or other conditions. buy remeron without prescription A person with purging disorder does not engage in binge order flagyl no prescription required eating, which is a characteristic of bulimia, and does not buy order have underweight, which is a characteristic of anorexia. A person order cheapest nexium dose with bulimia will engage in uncontrolled episodes of eating large best price bentyl amounts of food, often in secret. Bulimia involves periods of buy clomid lowest price bingeing and purging, while purging disorder involves purging behavior but buy buy in canada not bingeing. A person can build up an individual's self-esteem buy cheap atarax online usa with positive, supportive comments, such as how important their friendship purchase tizanidine online is. A person needs to contact the emergency services in no tablet the case of an emergency, such as threats of suicide buy zithromax without prescription or serious medical complications. A healthcare team consisting of therapists, doctors,.

Since Obama’s victory, an interesting debate has been going on about whether he really tapped the collective energies of Internet users in a collaborative way, or whether the Internet that was just a tool he used to conduct a very effective but fundamentally top-down campaign. There was a conference at the Berkman Center to discuss this and related questions; Yochai Benkler is eloquent in this video taking exception to the way Marshall Ganz had described Obama’s use of the Internet as an organizing tool. Some succinct essays surrounding these issues appear on the Berkman Center site here.

There’s an interesting short article in the Takoma (WA) News Tribune today entitled “Is Obama’s Web-based political revolution real or an illusion?” (It came to my attention because my wife, Marlyn McGrath, was quoted on the subject of how long it takes to read a college application — a number the reporter thought relevant since Obama has received 300,000 online applications for jobs in his administration. Also quoted is Professor Lillian Lee of Cornell, a Harvard PhD who used to be a teaching assistant for me — Lillian notes that the popularity metric used by the change.gov site for allowing certain posts to move up in the list is actually not awfully democratic in practice.)

Obama is trying lots of things, and that’s great. He probably could have been elected without the Internet, though it surely did him no harm to have collected millions of cell phone numbers on the promise that you’d be texted in the middle of the night about his VP pick, and a free “Go! Go! Go! Obama!” ring tone. Figuring out what actually works will take longer.

Comments are closed.