A flovent online doctor can diagnose the condition and provide a personalized treatment buy asacol plan to help manage symptoms. Medications for high blood pressure griseofulvin online stores can help a person achieve and maintain a healthy blood buy augmentin without prescription pressure, reducing the risk of comorbidities such as heart disease, order discount quinine online effects heart attack, and stroke. The absence of warnings or other amikacin prescription information for a given drug does not indicate that the buy viagra cheap drug or drug combination is safe, effective, or appropriate for buy cialis on line all patients or all specific uses. However, this article should find atrovent no prescription required not be used as a substitute for the knowledge and buy glyburide online expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. Feverfew may interact with mirapex without prescription various drugs, although researchers do not know the clinical relevance order diclofenac of these interactions. These provide vitamins, minerals, fiber, and phytochemicals, purchase generic cialis alternatives problems which are compounds that support wellness. While it is possible buy generic azor for MS to cause hearing problems, there are other more common.

Bella English has a good piece in the Globe today about JuicyCampus, the gossip site for all manner of cruel and mean-spirited postings about college students. She’s got the story pretty much right — what JuicyCampus is doing is appalling and, under CDA section 230, legal. An interesting detail she notes is that two states’ Attorneys General are investigating JuicyCampus for not enforcing its own rules against fraud. In the aftermath of the Lori Drew conviction, such charges may not be over-reaching.

As the article notes, there are mechanisms for at least trying to identify who posts a message if it’s truly defamatory (which requires showing actual damage, not mere cruelty). It’s onerous to bring a libel charge (thanks to the First Amendment), but I’m a bit surprised it hasn’t been attempted — the article, at least, mentions the possibility but not any actual cases where it’s been done. (Though JuicyCampus has turned over IP addresses in other cases where violent crimes seemed to be in the offing.)

This entry was posted on Monday, December 29th, 2008 at 12:09 pm and is filed under Social computing, Surveillance, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.