Blown To Bits

Two Newspaper Items of Note

Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
However, buy cheapest viagra those who experience changes to their vision, or those who buy cheap betnovate online are vulnerable, may benefit from certain interventions. Still, the amount cheap viagra from usa of weight a pregnant person should gain may vary based store get generic without glucophage prescription on an individual's health circumstances. A person's doctor can provide buy cialis low price them with additional information about what they can expect in cialis cheapest price the weeks and months following pituitary tumor surgery. Researchers should azor for sale avoid cherry-picking and usually sign an agreement that they have buy kenalog online no vested interest in the work. At this time, there buy cialis online cheap aren't any clinical trials to determine whether Vabysmo is safe zoloft online sales to receive during pregnancy. N. gonorrhoeae is a species of buy cheap glyburide alternative bacteria that causes the sexually transmitted infection (STI), gonorrhea. It depends.

First, the Chinese Internet censors are back to work following a bit of a break to buff the country’s image during the Olympic games. As of a few days ago, the New York Times web site became inaccessible from inside China. The press couldn’t get a comment from the government, but in the past, it has said that other countries regulate the Internet too. (Thus equating child pornography with the New York Times. Oh well, that’s what totalitarianism is about.)

And second, Gatehouse media, which publishes some suburban newspapers, has sued the New York Times because boston.com (the site of the Boston Globe, which is owned by the Times) was linking to some local stories in the Gatehouse publications. Just listing the headlines, with live link to the Gatehouse publications’ original stories. The legal issues are several — see this good analysis from the Citizen Media Law Project. It’s hard to think that what the Globe is doing is not well within “fair use” from a copyright standpoint. But either way, strategically it’s a head-scratcher. The Globe is steering traffic to the sites of obscure suburban newspapers almost no one reads. As the eloquent David Weinberger asks, why would those papers want that stopped?

Comments are closed.