Manipulative
buy side effects tendencies are common for people with HPD, as they may
buy tizanidine online feel a need to gain attention from those around them
zoloft or use their emotions to control those around them. Pathological
buy generic aldactone lying describes somebody who persistently and compulsively tells lies to
order buy no prescription the point that it damages their personal and professional lives
buy viagra from us and relationships. Avoiding judgment and blame while setting and maintaining
estrace online stores strong boundaries may help a person protect themselves and their
estrace for order relationship. Part of this behavior may involve lying and manipulation
cheap lumigan to gain the attention of those around them. This overwhelming
cheap price 60 anger may present suddenly and aggressively, seemingly out of proportion
viagra non prescription to the triggering event. It includes interviews, observations, and psychological
find generic without prescription assessments to evaluate the individual's personality traits and behavior patterns.
buy generic cream cost oral A person needs to prioritize personal safety and set clear
arcoxia online stores boundaries to protect themselves from emotional or physical harm. Individuals can.
First, the Chinese Internet censors are back to work following a bit of a break to buff the country’s image during the Olympic games. As of a few days ago, the New York Times web site became inaccessible from inside China. The press couldn’t get a comment from the government, but in the past, it has said that other countries regulate the Internet too. (Thus equating child pornography with the New York Times. Oh well, that’s what totalitarianism is about.)
And second, Gatehouse media, which publishes some suburban newspapers, has sued the New York Times because boston.com (the site of the Boston Globe, which is owned by the Times) was linking to some local stories in the Gatehouse publications. Just listing the headlines, with live link to the Gatehouse publications’ original stories. The legal issues are several — see this good analysis from the Citizen Media Law Project. It’s hard to think that what the Globe is doing is not well within “fair use” from a copyright standpoint. But either way, strategically it’s a head-scratcher. The Globe is steering traffic to the sites of obscure suburban newspapers almost no one reads. As the eloquent David Weinberger asks, why would those papers want that stopped?
This entry was posted
on Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 at 3:21 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Miscellaneous.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.