Some order zofran of these medications act as toxins that can injure the estradiol free delivery kidneys and lead to acute tubular necrosis. Antipsychotic drugs may buying cialis have unwanted side effects, and reducing or removing their use cheapest generic tetracycline can be beneficial with other care support, such as talk buy zyprexa no prescription required therapy. For example, it could involve fluids and rest for amikacin no prescription dehydration, or medication or dosage changes for side effects of buy compazine online cheap drugs. Medical News Today has made every effort to make viagra online stores certain that all information is factually correct, comprehensive, and up glyburide no prescription to date. Family, friends, therapists, and support groups can provide purchase vibramycin online emotional support to help people with pancreatic cancer who are order betnovate experiencing depression or anxiety. Cyltezo generic or biosimilarCyltezo (adalimumab-adbm) is order griseofulvin a biosimilar of the brand-name biologic drug Humira. A person generic robaxin can also get the virus from touching objects or surfaces order amikacin overnight delivery that have the virus on them and then touching their mouth.

First, the Chinese Internet censors are back to work following a bit of a break to buff the country’s image during the Olympic games. As of a few days ago, the New York Times web site became inaccessible from inside China. The press couldn’t get a comment from the government, but in the past, it has said that other countries regulate the Internet too. (Thus equating child pornography with the New York Times. Oh well, that’s what totalitarianism is about.)

And second, Gatehouse media, which publishes some suburban newspapers, has sued the New York Times because boston.com (the site of the Boston Globe, which is owned by the Times) was linking to some local stories in the Gatehouse publications. Just listing the headlines, with live link to the Gatehouse publications’ original stories. The legal issues are several — see this good analysis from the Citizen Media Law Project. It’s hard to think that what the Globe is doing is not well within “fair use” from a copyright standpoint. But either way, strategically it’s a head-scratcher. The Globe is steering traffic to the sites of obscure suburban newspapers almost no one reads. As the eloquent David Weinberger asks, why would those papers want that stopped?

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 at 3:21 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Miscellaneous. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.