However, atarax without a prescription this article should not be used as a substitute for tizanidine pill the knowledge and expertise of a licensed healthcare professional. People levitra purchase low free price with certain conditions, such as multiple sclerosis, may need to cialis for order give themselves this type of injection at home. Physical therapy cheap cialis no prescription that focuses on the pelvic floor, or a type of order aldactone therapy known as biofeedback, may add to this. Working with cheap methotrexate from canada the staff can help to ensure they have the necessary cheap synthroid tablet information.After the office submits the request for prior approval, the cipro online stores insurer will process it and send a letter with notification order celexa of denial or acceptance. However, studies suggest that MS may cialis for order cause heat intolerance and issues with body temperature regulation and discount serevent online sweat production. The cancer spreads when prostate cancer cells travel robaxin for sale in the blood or lymphatic system to a different part buy generic acomplia cost oral of the body. However, this article should not be used as.

First, the Chinese Internet censors are back to work following a bit of a break to buff the country’s image during the Olympic games. As of a few days ago, the New York Times web site became inaccessible from inside China. The press couldn’t get a comment from the government, but in the past, it has said that other countries regulate the Internet too. (Thus equating child pornography with the New York Times. Oh well, that’s what totalitarianism is about.)

And second, Gatehouse media, which publishes some suburban newspapers, has sued the New York Times because boston.com (the site of the Boston Globe, which is owned by the Times) was linking to some local stories in the Gatehouse publications. Just listing the headlines, with live link to the Gatehouse publications’ original stories. The legal issues are several — see this good analysis from the Citizen Media Law Project. It’s hard to think that what the Globe is doing is not well within “fair use” from a copyright standpoint. But either way, strategically it’s a head-scratcher. The Globe is steering traffic to the sites of obscure suburban newspapers almost no one reads. As the eloquent David Weinberger asks, why would those papers want that stopped?

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 24th, 2008 at 3:21 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Miscellaneous. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.