Blown To Bits

Google-Bombing Obama

Friday, January 30th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
However, atarax free delivery CBD may help relieve specific symptoms health experts associate with store get generic without diclofenac prescription Alzheimer's disease, such as anxiety, inflammation, agitation, discomfort, and difficulty discount petcam (metacam) oral suspension sleeping. The authors found that the condition can induce painful diflucan sale repetitive muscular contractions that weaken the uterine muscle and cause betnovate sale spontaneous abortion. RYGB surgeryRYGB surgery can treat GERD or acid cheap retin-a no rx reflux that develops following other bariatric surgeries. Scientists theorize that buy ventolin low serotonin levels may cause depression, so medication that raises buy generic flagyl best price the levels may help. If you'd like to learn more cafergot online sales about eating certain foods during treatment with Crestor, talk with buy cipro online australia your doctor. In many cases, the immune system can clear discount amoxicillin online the HPV infection naturally, but in some cases, the virus can.

Barak Obama was the object of a google-bombing — searches for “cheerful achievement” got you links to Obama. And Obama inherited from George Bush some of the White-House-directed search results for “miserable failure.”

We talk about Google bombs in Blown to Bits (p. 150). Some conservative sources are suggesting political explanations for the fact that Google moved more quickly against these bombs than it did when the object was Bush. That seems a pretty silly idea — Google would have much better ways to create partisan slant than this. I imagine Google is simply very reluctant to interfere with the natural search results, and it took several years to develop algorithms that could reliably distinguish Google bombs from legitimate shifts in the ranks of pages. They would surely like the whole search engine to operate as an automaton exactly so they could not be accused manipulating results for partisan purposes. But getting algorithms to do things about which human beings might make different judgments is a tricky business.

Comments are closed.