After dexamethasone for order surgeons remove the initial stent, using a vaginal dilator or buy lipitor without prescription having regular sex — when a doctor says it is buy erythromycin without prescription safe to resume sexual activity — may be necessary to buy flagyl without prescription keep the vagina open. If Calquence is taken with a norvasc no prescription drug that blocks CYP3A4, it can lead to more Calquence retin-a no prescription remaining in the body. Lymphoma and other rare cancers have purchase remeron online been reported in children and teenagers taking drugs similar to buy cephalexin Amjevita. If a healthcare professional suspects someone may have Richter's pamoate buy syndrome, they will likely ask a surgeon to perform a buy generic xalatan biopsy or CT scan of an enlarged lymph node. Sharing drug 60 experiences and feelings with others who understand can provide comfort and.

How far is it fair to go to put the spotlight on those opposing you by making public information about them readily accessible? Supporters of gay marriange in California have taken public information — the addresses of those supporters of the gay marriage ban who gave more than $100 — and put it on an easy-to-access map. You can look at the map and see who in your neighborhood gave money to help get the ban passed. Or, who in my neighborhood.

The use of the Internet for public shaming — or is it intimidation? — is not new. The Nuremberg Files was the most troubling example of the genre — listing the addresses of doctors who performed abortions, and graying out their names if they were murdered. The site also listed where their children went to school.

The gay marriage advocates haven’t gone that far, but they have gone far enough to cause some real discomfort. The New York Times reports that to fight back, an attempt will be made to change the law so that the addresses of donors of as little as $100 are no longer public information.

Who has the better of the free speech argument here — those who feel intimidated, and hence feel their speech is being chilled; or those who just want to publish on the Web in a convenient form information that has long been considered public anyway?

This entry was posted on Monday, January 19th, 2009 at 2:43 pm and is filed under Social computing, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.