It order discount no is best for an individual to discuss the procedure's potential purchase generic artane alternatives problems benefits, risks, and complications with a healthcare professional. Proper preparation, viagra no rx required knowing what to expect during and after the surgery, and buy diovan a well-defined recovery plan are key to a successful proctectomy. buy cheap sale A colonoscopy may increase the risk of injury to inflamed cheap flagyl or easily irritated tissues, increasing the risk of bleeding or buy cheap cafergot online perforation. A colonoscopy is generally safe and a common procedure buy canada that is important for finding and treating early signs of buy quinine without prescription colorectal cancer. Severe illness or pregnancy may mean a person buy cheap arcoxia is unsuitable for a colonoscopy, but people will need to cheapest viagra online talk with a doctor if they have any risk factors generic remeron or symptoms. Colorectal cancer can produce carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), a cialis drug protein which, at a higher level, may suggest colon cancer. Before.

How far is it fair to go to put the spotlight on those opposing you by making public information about them readily accessible? Supporters of gay marriange in California have taken public information — the addresses of those supporters of the gay marriage ban who gave more than $100 — and put it on an easy-to-access map. You can look at the map and see who in your neighborhood gave money to help get the ban passed. Or, who in my neighborhood.

The use of the Internet for public shaming — or is it intimidation? — is not new. The Nuremberg Files was the most troubling example of the genre — listing the addresses of doctors who performed abortions, and graying out their names if they were murdered. The site also listed where their children went to school.

The gay marriage advocates haven’t gone that far, but they have gone far enough to cause some real discomfort. The New York Times reports that to fight back, an attempt will be made to change the law so that the addresses of donors of as little as $100 are no longer public information.

Who has the better of the free speech argument here — those who feel intimidated, and hence feel their speech is being chilled; or those who just want to publish on the Web in a convenient form information that has long been considered public anyway?

This entry was posted on Monday, January 19th, 2009 at 2:43 pm and is filed under Social computing, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.