However, cheap tizanidine the American Academy of Pediatrics advises that children and adolescents kenalog without prescription avoid caffeinated drinks due to their effects on sleep and cheap generic arcoxia blood pressure. However, this article should not be used as viagra purchase low free price a substitute for the knowledge and expertise of a licensed cafergot online healthcare professional. The immune system includes white blood cells, which purchase discount clomid sale doctors call leukocytes, that travel around a person's body and purchase retin-a online attack perceived threats. The inflammation that AS causes can also order cialis no prescription result in inflammation in the temporomandibular joints (TMJ). Treatment may purchase discount pamoate sale include antihistamines for mild allergies and emergency medications, such as purchase cheapest diflucan price tablet EpiPen adrenaline injectors for severe reactions. Only a healthcare professional buy generic viagra cost professional can diagnose low renin and help determine its cause, so buy norvasc without prescription seek medical care for high blood pressure. Neurons and circuits cheap cafergot from uk in the brain coordinate their inputs to help establish and maintain.

How far is it fair to go to put the spotlight on those opposing you by making public information about them readily accessible? Supporters of gay marriange in California have taken public information — the addresses of those supporters of the gay marriage ban who gave more than $100 — and put it on an easy-to-access map. You can look at the map and see who in your neighborhood gave money to help get the ban passed. Or, who in my neighborhood.

The use of the Internet for public shaming — or is it intimidation? — is not new. The Nuremberg Files was the most troubling example of the genre — listing the addresses of doctors who performed abortions, and graying out their names if they were murdered. The site also listed where their children went to school.

The gay marriage advocates haven’t gone that far, but they have gone far enough to cause some real discomfort. The New York Times reports that to fight back, an attempt will be made to change the law so that the addresses of donors of as little as $100 are no longer public information.

Who has the better of the free speech argument here — those who feel intimidated, and hence feel their speech is being chilled; or those who just want to publish on the Web in a convenient form information that has long been considered public anyway?

This entry was posted on Monday, January 19th, 2009 at 2:43 pm and is filed under Social computing, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.