With levitra the cells not producing enough dopamine, it is harder for gentamicin eye drops for sale the brain to control movement, leading to symptoms including tremors cheapest generic viagra and stiffness. These cells contain abnormal hemoglobin molecules called hemoglobin free zyprexa S (HbS), which may be responsible for distorting them into buy methotrexate online australia the sickle shape. This can include memory suppression techniques, identifying buy free glyburide triggers, and contacting a mental health specialist. The National Institute sale toradol of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) mentions self-care buying cialis cost tips, medications, and devices that may help treat ED. Sit discount artane straight.Reach with the right hand and place the back of buy discount advair without prescription info the hand on the outside of the left knee. Individuals cialis online should note that opioids do not treat the cause of cheapest remeron pain but instead lower the brain's perception of pain. Exposure buy viagra online australia therapy is a technique that helps reduce the symptoms of buy quinine no prescription sample PTSD, phobias, and other mental health conditions by introducing triggering atarax online stores stimuli in a safe environment. A doctor will deliver the injection.

How far is it fair to go to put the spotlight on those opposing you by making public information about them readily accessible? Supporters of gay marriange in California have taken public information — the addresses of those supporters of the gay marriage ban who gave more than $100 — and put it on an easy-to-access map. You can look at the map and see who in your neighborhood gave money to help get the ban passed. Or, who in my neighborhood.

The use of the Internet for public shaming — or is it intimidation? — is not new. The Nuremberg Files was the most troubling example of the genre — listing the addresses of doctors who performed abortions, and graying out their names if they were murdered. The site also listed where their children went to school.

The gay marriage advocates haven’t gone that far, but they have gone far enough to cause some real discomfort. The New York Times reports that to fight back, an attempt will be made to change the law so that the addresses of donors of as little as $100 are no longer public information.

Who has the better of the free speech argument here — those who feel intimidated, and hence feel their speech is being chilled; or those who just want to publish on the Web in a convenient form information that has long been considered public anyway?

This entry was posted on Monday, January 19th, 2009 at 2:43 pm and is filed under Social computing, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.