AntipsychoticsAntipsychotic viagra rx medications relieve symptoms of psychosis, which is a break from purchase cheapest celexa no prescription tablets reality during a manic episode. PID is the term for buy dexamethasone from canada inflammation anywhere in the upper genital tract, including the ovaries, real cephalexin without prescription fallopian tubes, and uterus. Following time-restricted feeding, they improved on buy cheap petcam (metacam) oral suspension online both tests, whereas the Alzheimer's disease mice on unlimited food purchase estrace online continued to show deficits. "Physical therapists identify the area of order betnovate lowest dosage cheapest price muscles or muscle that is likely the source of discomfort," buy generic clonidine cost work explains Syan. A doctor may ask the child's caregiver about viagra malaysia any prescribed and over-the-counter medications that the child may take. buy gentamicin eye drops online The cause of pulsatile tinnitus will inform which treatments and buy cheap spiriva online strategies work best to ease the symptoms. When ceramide levels amoxicillin medication decline, the stratum corneum or protective outer barrier of the cheap lipitor tablets skin becomes compromised, and tiny cracks can form. The Diagnostic and.

How far is it fair to go to put the spotlight on those opposing you by making public information about them readily accessible? Supporters of gay marriange in California have taken public information — the addresses of those supporters of the gay marriage ban who gave more than $100 — and put it on an easy-to-access map. You can look at the map and see who in your neighborhood gave money to help get the ban passed. Or, who in my neighborhood.

The use of the Internet for public shaming — or is it intimidation? — is not new. The Nuremberg Files was the most troubling example of the genre — listing the addresses of doctors who performed abortions, and graying out their names if they were murdered. The site also listed where their children went to school.

The gay marriage advocates haven’t gone that far, but they have gone far enough to cause some real discomfort. The New York Times reports that to fight back, an attempt will be made to change the law so that the addresses of donors of as little as $100 are no longer public information.

Who has the better of the free speech argument here — those who feel intimidated, and hence feel their speech is being chilled; or those who just want to publish on the Web in a convenient form information that has long been considered public anyway?

This entry was posted on Monday, January 19th, 2009 at 2:43 pm and is filed under Social computing, The explosion, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.