The ampicillin prescription price you pay for ondansetron tablets, ODT, or liquid solution online bangkok may be less if you have insurance. If a drug discount prozac requires prior authorization but you start treatment without the prior pyrantel pamoate no prescription approval, you could pay the full cost of the medication. buy cheap remeron But if you have health insurance, you'll need to talk buy viagra canada with your insurance provider to learn the actual cost you diclofenac buy drug would pay for ondansetron. The absence of warnings or other purchase t-ject 60 online information for a given drug does not indicate that the buy cheap discount alternative drug or drug combination is safe, effective, or appropriate for buy augmentin low cheap price all patients or all specific uses. Experts recommend taking the retin-a online correct medication doses exactly as prescribed to help promote the buy aldactone online healing process. In order to speed up the healing process, people.

IANAL (I am not a lawyer) and I have no idea if Professor Charles Nesson is going to prevail in his defense of Joel Tenenbaum and his counterclaims that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is unconstitutional. But the recording industry sure is taking him seriously. When Nesson asked for a hearing in the case to be webcast, the RIAA reacted with horror — rather oddly, as the judge noted in granting Nesson’s request, given that the RIAA claims that it wants publicity of its anti-piracy campaign. Now the judge has delayed the hearing so the RIAA can appeal to a higher court her ruling about webcasting the proceedings.

Meanwhile, the RIAA sent Nesson a letter (pdf) demanding that he drop a request for a deposition by one of the RIAA’s former lawyers, stating that it would ask the court to sanction him if he didn’t comply. Nesson’s classic reply, quoted verbatim:

our motion stands

we welcome your opposition

And the next day the RIAA went ahead and filed court papers stating that “Defendant‚Äôs Motion has no factual or legal basis whatsoever” and asking Nesson to pay for their costs in opposing it (as apparently the law provides in the case of certain patently gratuitous motions).

There are serious and important issues at stake here, as we discuss in Chapter 6 of Blown to Bits. But on top of that, the lawyers’ duel makes good theatre.

This entry was posted on Friday, January 23rd, 2009 at 8:27 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.