It atarax without prescription can then spread to the other organs, causing acute respiratory metronidazole gel sale distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute kidney injury. Until a person order spiriva can see a doctor, they should cover the area with buy free 60 a clean and dry bandage and wash their hands often. order lasix That can include contact with a contaminated wound or sharing buy quinine towels, razors, or other items that touched infected skin. What amikacin without prescription comes from an abscess or boil can be very contagious, buy free cipro prescription so people should avoid draining boils at home. This depends amikacin without prescription on a variety of factors, such as the site of buy cheap atarax infection, a person's age, and other medical conditions they may buy lipitor pills have. If a person has an infected or painful abscess, flovent australia a healthcare professional will usually drain it of fluid by buy cheap flovent making an incision. An infected abscess that a person leaves allopurinol online stores untreated can spread to the bloodstream and lymph nodes, which cheap online no prescription can be life threatening. A person should seek medical attention immediately.

Oncer again, in the name of protecting America’s children from exploitation, Congress is considering a massive increase in data collection about the activities of you, me, and everyone else. Specifically, the SAFETY Act (click for the full text) would require that

A provider of an electronic communication service or remote computing service shall retain for a period of at least two years all records or other information pertaining to the identity of a user of a temporarily assigned network address the service assigns to that user.

That means not just your Internet Service Provider at home, but Starbucks. And the beneficiaries would be not just police looking for pedophiles, but the recording industry looking for people who downloaded music in an airport lounge.

As we have said before (here and here, for example), the Internet threats to child safety have been mischaracterized and exaggerated, and spending resources on programs like this draws resources away from places where they are badly needed, helping troubled children from troubled families. Bills like this are transparent attempts to exploit the child safety issue to ramp up government data collection about innocent citizens, data that will be repurposed and abused once it has been collected. It’s the kind of Big-Brother surveillance proposed in the UK, as we discussed last fall.

Stop this madness. There is zero evidence that this is a sensible solution to the problem the bill claims to be aimed at, and it is an unconscionable invasion of our rights to privacy.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 20th, 2009 at 6:32 pm and is filed under Privacy, Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.