If purchase ventolin online you would like to notify the FDA about a side canadian pharmacy cialis effect you've had with Unithroid, you can do so through synthroid online stores MedWatch. Therefore, while the term and the attribution of it buy diclofenac in us to flesh and blood human beings are reasonably modern, the best price for colchicine concept of agender and people who identify as agender have generic viagra prescription professional been around for millennia. There are many types of Medicare clonidine cheap drug plans, so your coverage and what you pay for prescriptions discount advair will be based on your particular plan's benefits. A treatment buy cheap arcoxia plan will depend on the severity of the condition, the certified cialis amount of joint damage, patient preference, and the presence of comorbidities..

Oncer again, in the name of protecting America’s children from exploitation, Congress is considering a massive increase in data collection about the activities of you, me, and everyone else. Specifically, the SAFETY Act (click for the full text) would require that

A provider of an electronic communication service or remote computing service shall retain for a period of at least two years all records or other information pertaining to the identity of a user of a temporarily assigned network address the service assigns to that user.

That means not just your Internet Service Provider at home, but Starbucks. And the beneficiaries would be not just police looking for pedophiles, but the recording industry looking for people who downloaded music in an airport lounge.

As we have said before (here and here, for example), the Internet threats to child safety have been mischaracterized and exaggerated, and spending resources on programs like this draws resources away from places where they are badly needed, helping troubled children from troubled families. Bills like this are transparent attempts to exploit the child safety issue to ramp up government data collection about innocent citizens, data that will be repurposed and abused once it has been collected. It’s the kind of Big-Brother surveillance proposed in the UK, as we discussed last fall.

Stop this madness. There is zero evidence that this is a sensible solution to the problem the bill claims to be aimed at, and it is an unconscionable invasion of our rights to privacy.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 20th, 2009 at 6:32 pm and is filed under Privacy, Surveillance. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.