Blown To Bits

Facebook’s Lawyers Screw Up Digital Redaction

Thursday, February 12th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
Adults find cialis on internet who experienced childhood trauma may have a higher risk of buy cheap asacol mental health conditions and certain physical health conditions. Raynaud's syndrome purchase cheapest buy no prescription tablets is a vascular disorder that typically affects the fingers and atenolol online stores toes but can affect other body parts, such as the buy kenalog online ears and nose. Anyone with Raynaud's phenomenon who notices sores order clindamycin gel or infections in the affected areas or who has any purchase cheap allopurinol low cost consultation reason to believe they have a higher risk of heart cheapest for side effects dose disease should contact their doctor. Factors such as stress, child discount lasix neglect, and maternal deprivations may play a role in the buying buy development of pica among children. According to the National Eating cialis pill Disorders Association (NEDA), people who have any form of pica, buy pills including geophagia, should undergo tests for nutritional deficiencies. If a person.

On pages 73-77 of Blown to Bits, we go through three cases in which editors electronically redacted documents to remove sensitive information, not realizing that the way they were doing the redaction changed only the way the document appeared on the screen. The internal representation of the document still included the redacted text, which a simple cut and paste operation disclosed.

Not the most fascinating part of the book, I’ll bet. In fact, I’ll bet some of you skipped over it fairly quickly.

These were serious mistakes with big consequences. I hadn’t heard any recent reports of similar failures.

But the underlying problem hasn’t gone away. The electronic “document” metaphor is too convincing. It’s easy for a editor to infer that what is happening on the screen is what is really happening to the computer file.

A few days ago, it was disclosed that the value put on Facebook at the time the settlement with ConnectU was a lot less than it might have been, had the value been based on Microsoft’s subsequent purchase of a percentage of Facebook. How do we know? The imputed value (and ConnectU’s settlement) were inadvertently revealed by Facebook’s lawyers. Revealed how? Here is the account offered by SiliconValley.com:

Large portions of that hearing are redacted in a transcript of the June hearing, but The Associated Press was able to read the blacked-out portions by copying from an electronic version of the document and pasting the results into another document.

How embarrassing. Moral: read Chapter 3. And remember it!

Added 2/13:¬†Here is the actual PDF. Go to page 22. At the bottom is some whited out text preceded by the word “REDACTED”. Select the white space on the screen (you can do this with any PDF reader) and copy it, then paste it into your usual wordprocessor. Like magic, the $65 million dollar figure appears!

Comments are closed.