Private buy side effects insurance companies administer Medicare Advantage plans, which are also known buy acomplia without prescription as Medicare Part C. These bundled plans are an alternative cheap buy tablets to original Medicare and generally also include prescription drug cover. free cheapest If an individual is not satisfied with their Medicare coverage, buy cheap griseofulvin online canada they may change or switch plans during the OEP. Medicare get cheap prescription best price tablet Part C, also known as Medicare Advantage, is a bundled betnovate no rx required plan that usually includes coverage for prescription medication, as well generic augmentin as some additional benefits. DIS may also result in some cheap cialis less common problems, such as sinus issues and damage to buy cheap clindamycin gel online the dental implant itself. Dental implants are a good solution buy discount buy online info for people who are replacing teeth damaged by severe decay discount griseofulvin or trauma. As with a person's natural teeth, an implant buy generic azor best price and the tissues surrounding it require regular cleaning. However, if pain.

The abominably misnamed “Fairness Doctrine” seems to be gathering steam for reinstatement. I have no political axe to grind here; I’m an information free-marketeer. Can you imagine any court going along with the proposition that by government regulation, editorial opinions in newspapers have to be politically balanced? Given the First Amendment, it is hard to think of anything more un-American.

The argument goes that the airwaves are different; they are public property and there are only so many to go around. As a national resource, they should be distributed “fairly,” so that a range of views can be heard.

There are so many things wrong with this argument from a purely philosophical point of view that it’s hard to know where to begin. Should truth and falsehood be equally represented, and if not, who is to decide whether someone’s claimed truth is actually false? Do Darwin and Usher get equal time to express their views on the age of the earth?

But the fundamental problem here is that spectrum scarcity, which is the premise for its nationalization and government control, is artificial. Chapter 8 explains the reasons, but my evidence could not be simpler. Hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of broadcast radio stations coexist around you right now. They are called cell phones. Modern radio technology is much more efficient than that of the 1930s when the present schemes for allocating broadcast licenses were legislated.

The case for the government to dictate content of radio broadcasts is very week philosophically, but without its technological foundation, it collapses completely.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 12th, 2009 at 11:30 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Radio and television, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.