But buy generic asacol problems if you have health insurance, you'll need to talk with erythromycin your insurance provider to learn the actual cost you would atrovent pay for lamotrigine. Symptoms can include muscle weakness, drooping eyelids, augmentin for sale and difficulty breathing, speaking, or swallowing. The Lazarus Naturals manufacturing clindamycin buy drug facility implements the Current Good Manufacturing Practices outlined by the clindamycin uk Food and Drug Administration (FDA). While a person cannot easily mirapex for order perform a test for Hegar's sign on themselves, they can buy glucophage without prescription look for symptoms suggestive of Hegar's sign. Medical News Today generic alesse (ovral l) has made every effort to make certain that all information augmentin without prescription is factually correct, comprehensive, and up to date. Because of amikacin lowest uk cost get cheapest this, you should talk with your doctor or pharmacist before buy cialis on internet taking any vitamin product with Lamictal. Sudden changes in awareness, cheap arcoxia thinking, mobility, or personality could be due to delirium, stroke, viagra for order or simply a change in routine that has caused distress. Researchers.

The abominably misnamed “Fairness Doctrine” seems to be gathering steam for reinstatement. I have no political axe to grind here; I’m an information free-marketeer. Can you imagine any court going along with the proposition that by government regulation, editorial opinions in newspapers have to be politically balanced? Given the First Amendment, it is hard to think of anything more un-American.

The argument goes that the airwaves are different; they are public property and there are only so many to go around. As a national resource, they should be distributed “fairly,” so that a range of views can be heard.

There are so many things wrong with this argument from a purely philosophical point of view that it’s hard to know where to begin. Should truth and falsehood be equally represented, and if not, who is to decide whether someone’s claimed truth is actually false? Do Darwin and Usher get equal time to express their views on the age of the earth?

But the fundamental problem here is that spectrum scarcity, which is the premise for its nationalization and government control, is artificial. Chapter 8 explains the reasons, but my evidence could not be simpler. Hundreds of thousands, maybe millions, of broadcast radio stations coexist around you right now. They are called cell phones. Modern radio technology is much more efficient than that of the 1930s when the present schemes for allocating broadcast licenses were legislated.

The case for the government to dictate content of radio broadcasts is very week philosophically, but without its technological foundation, it collapses completely.

This entry was posted on Thursday, February 12th, 2009 at 11:30 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Radio and television, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.