Dong atarax purchase low free price quai may worsen hormone-sensitive conditions and pose a danger for buy generic clindamycin gel people taking blood-thinning medications, such as Warfarin. They may also cheapest discount buy online info order imaging tests, such as a thyroid ultrasound, to evaluate buy generic online best price the structure of the thyroid gland. Healthy levels of thyroid purchase artane online hormones are important for overall health, and untreated subclinical hyperthyroidism discount tizanidine may cause complications. Subclinical hyperthyroidism is a condition characterized by order generic discount prescription and alcohol low or undetectable levels of TSH with normal levels of approved buy drug free thyroid hormones. To learn about other mild side effects, buy vibramycin online talk with your doctor or pharmacist, or view Unithroid's prescribing buy triamterene information. Unithroid is approved to suppress (lower) thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) discount clomid levels in people with a certain type of thyroid cancer. order discount azor If you need financial support to pay for Unithroid, or viagra for sale if you need help understanding your insurance coverage, help is available..

Robert Darnton, a historian and head of Harvard’s library system, has an important article in the New York Review of Books, called Google and the Future of Books. It lays the utopian Enlightenment vision of a “Republic of Letters” side by side with the development of the Internet. Darnton explains beautifully how the Enlightenment ideal failed to come about (through professionalization and commercialization of knowledge), and warns that we are about to miss another opportunity because of the settlement hammered out between the publishing industry and Google about copyright issues with the Google Books project. The most poignant passage is the following:

Looking back over the course of digitization from the 1990s, we now can see that we missed a great opportunity. Action by Congress and the Library of Congress or a grand alliance of research libraries supported by a coalition of foundations could have done the job [of digitizing the world’s books and making them available over the Internet] at a feasible cost and designed it in a manner that would have put the public interest first.¬†‚Ķ¬†We could have created a National Digital Library‚Äîthe twenty-first-century equivalent of the Library of Alexandria. It is too late now. Not only have we failed to realize that possibility, but, even worse, we are allowing a question of public policy‚Äîthe control of access to information‚Äîto be determined by private lawsuit.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 6th, 2009 at 6:44 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.