But best price for viagra if you have health insurance, you'll need to talk with cialis medication your insurance provider to learn the actual cost you would tablet atrovent pay for Herceptin. A stroke may damage the parts of advair generic order the brain that receive signals from the sensors within the betnovate price bladder. Period poverty refers to the social, economic, political, and amoxicillin online cultural barriers to menstrual products, education, and sanitation. To find buy flagyl out how often side effects occurred in clinical trials, see buy atenolol online cheap the prescribing information for Motegrity. Medical News Today has made find viagra without prescription every effort to make certain that all information is factually glyburide online correct, comprehensive, and up to date. However, hospice care focuses buy cialis on internet on providing care and comfort to someone approaching the end alesse (ovral l) sale of their life. If the enzyme is not working effectively, the.

Robert Darnton, a historian and head of Harvard’s library system, has an important article in the New York Review of Books, called Google and the Future of Books. It lays the utopian Enlightenment vision of a “Republic of Letters” side by side with the development of the Internet. Darnton explains beautifully how the Enlightenment ideal failed to come about (through professionalization and commercialization of knowledge), and warns that we are about to miss another opportunity because of the settlement hammered out between the publishing industry and Google about copyright issues with the Google Books project. The most poignant passage is the following:

Looking back over the course of digitization from the 1990s, we now can see that we missed a great opportunity. Action by Congress and the Library of Congress or a grand alliance of research libraries supported by a coalition of foundations could have done the job [of digitizing the world’s books and making them available over the Internet] at a feasible cost and designed it in a manner that would have put the public interest first.¬†‚Ķ¬†We could have created a National Digital Library‚Äîthe twenty-first-century equivalent of the Library of Alexandria. It is too late now. Not only have we failed to realize that possibility, but, even worse, we are allowing a question of public policy‚Äîthe control of access to information‚Äîto be determined by private lawsuit.

This entry was posted on Friday, February 6th, 2009 at 6:44 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.