Tracking Your Car in Massachusetts
Tuesday, February 10th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
People side effects purchase norvasc cheap with heart failure can experience nausea or loss of appetite buy remeron without prescription due to the lack of blood flowing to the digestive buy flovent without prescription system and liver. Authors of a review must decide whether buy triamterene online the quality of a source is "high" or "low," in free nasonex other words how reliable each one is. The goal of cheapest kenalog FMS is to achieve a more typically masculine appearance while cheap advair taking the person's overall facial proportions and anatomy into consideration. cheap lasix Not getting enough omega-3s can also affect the skin, causing cialis buy online swollen, itchy rashes or scaly, dry patches. There are several cheap amikacin in canada conditions that can mimic asthma symptoms and that people mistake purchase synthroid online for the condition. Many cardiac arrests occur because a person discount amikacin side effects usa has had a heart attack, which causes an abnormal heart buy free advair no prescription dosage rhythm, known as arrhythmia. Doctors may prescribe sedative medications, such purchase azor online as benzodiazepines or barbiturates, to treat eclampsia that does not order serevent respond to magnesium treatment. For more information about the possible side.
Buried in a story about Governor Patrick’s plans about the Massachusetts gas tax is an interesting detail:
Patrick is also considering a new system that would charge drivers based on the miles they travel. Those trips would be measured by a chip installed in a vehicle inspection sticker.
No more information is provided, and I couldn’t find anything on the Commonwealth’s web site. It sounds vaguely like the Oregon proposal about which I previously blogged, which didn’t make a lot of sense as it was described — a GPS monitor used only to log miles traveled, which would be uploaded at gas stations when you refilled your car. This sounds different, but I don’t even understand the theory here. For a “chip” (an RFID presumably) to be embedded in a “sticker,” it would have to be a passive device, no battery, and could be read only from a distance of a few inches or at most a foot or two — not the active RFIDs like the ones in toll booth transponders. How would such a “chip” be used to track how many miles you’ve driven?