Blown To Bits

Apple’s Anti-Competitive Use of Copyright

Saturday, March 14th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
Smoking price of online cannabis may have some potential benefits for other eye conditions, buy discount buy online such as glaucoma, so experts suggest the same may be order cream no prescription true for macular degeneration. Also, keep in mind that the drug viagra online purchase FDA has not approved nonprescription CBD products, and some products cheap no prescription may be inaccurately labeled. Some gummies made with full-spectrum hemp low cost viagra extract may have stronger effects due to the entourage effect purchase cheap mirapex sale overdose that the cannabinoids and terpenes working together can produce. While buy prices there is no evidence to show CBD can directly treat sale atrovent erectile dysfunction (ED), it can help with other conditions that buy cheap t-ject 60 may increase a person's risk of developing it. Researchers are purchase advair price work evaluating the effectiveness of cannabinoids to determine whether these can buy in malaysia improve symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis. The human body viagra buy drug contains the endocannabinoid system, which regulates different functions, such as atenolol sale appetite, emotional behavior, pain sensation, and memory. The researchers state that.

On page 216 of the book, we joke that DMCA might stand for “Digital Millennium Competition Avoidance” rather than “‚Ķ Copyright Act.” The idea is that if a company puts a digital lock on any interface to its equipment, then the anti-circumvention provision of the DMCA makes it illegal for an maker of accessories to reverse-engineer the lock to figure out how to make a compatible accessory. Apple Computer has given us a classic example of this technique.

If you walk into any electronics store or any WalMarts, you’ll find lots of earphones that you can use with your iPod, in case you lose the ones it came with, or they don’t fit your ears, or whatever. The earphones are on the racks with slipcovers and lots of other non-Apple stuff that accessorizes iPods. Of course you can buy Apple earphones, but maybe you’d rather buy the ones that fit better.

Well, Apple wants you to buy Apple earphones. The way the capitalist world is supposed to work, Apple is supposed to achieve that by making better earphones, or by cutting its prices. Everyone else has the same incentives, and the consumer wins from the competition.

Oh, not in the America of the DMCA. Apple has engineered the new iPod Shuffle so that the replacement headphones won’t work unless they have built into them an “authentication chip” the headphone maker can get only from Apple. Now the headphone maker is prohibited by law from trying to figure out what the “authentication chip” does so it can make headphones you can just plug into the Shuffle without, in essence, asking Apple’s permission and paying Apple money. So Apple winds up controlling the headphone market.

A classic case of copyright law being put to a use that has nothing at all to do with the protection of books or music or images — just to kill competition, to the advantage of one company and to the plain disadvantage of the public.

Thanks to Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation for raising a stink.

Comments are closed.