Blown To Bits

Apple’s Anti-Competitive Use of Copyright

Saturday, March 14th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
If zithromax buy online a person has an infection of the lymph nodes due cipro in australia to a cold or sore throat, it can cause them allopurinol internet to develop a secondary infection of the salivary glands. Depending retin-a free delivery on the condition they are testing for, doctors may also dexamethasone no prescription test for other gases in the breath. Once frozen, a order acomplia person will need to continue to pay storage fees until buy (metacam) cheap they no longer wish to store the sperm. Individuals living buy discount (metacam) without prescription info with lupus should consult a doctor if they plan to order cheap prednisolone work begin a new method of birth control. People can speak toradol for order with a physical therapist to learn more about safe abdominal griseofulvin online stores exercises for osteoporosis. The review found that various animal and cafergot prescription human studies suggested spearmint oil had analgesic effects. People with triamterene uk DMD experience progressive muscle weakness, heart problems, breathing difficulties, and other.

On page 216 of the book, we joke that DMCA might stand for “Digital Millennium Competition Avoidance” rather than “‚Ķ Copyright Act.” The idea is that if a company puts a digital lock on any interface to its equipment, then the anti-circumvention provision of the DMCA makes it illegal for an maker of accessories to reverse-engineer the lock to figure out how to make a compatible accessory. Apple Computer has given us a classic example of this technique.

If you walk into any electronics store or any WalMarts, you’ll find lots of earphones that you can use with your iPod, in case you lose the ones it came with, or they don’t fit your ears, or whatever. The earphones are on the racks with slipcovers and lots of other non-Apple stuff that accessorizes iPods. Of course you can buy Apple earphones, but maybe you’d rather buy the ones that fit better.

Well, Apple wants you to buy Apple earphones. The way the capitalist world is supposed to work, Apple is supposed to achieve that by making better earphones, or by cutting its prices. Everyone else has the same incentives, and the consumer wins from the competition.

Oh, not in the America of the DMCA. Apple has engineered the new iPod Shuffle so that the replacement headphones won’t work unless they have built into them an “authentication chip” the headphone maker can get only from Apple. Now the headphone maker is prohibited by law from trying to figure out what the “authentication chip” does so it can make headphones you can just plug into the Shuffle without, in essence, asking Apple’s permission and paying Apple money. So Apple winds up controlling the headphone market.

A classic case of copyright law being put to a use that has nothing at all to do with the protection of books or music or images — just to kill competition, to the advantage of one company and to the plain disadvantage of the public.

Thanks to Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation for raising a stink.

Comments are closed.