Blown To Bits

Apple’s Anti-Competitive Use of Copyright

Saturday, March 14th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
Talk cheapest cipro with your doctor or pharmacist, who can provide personalized guidance lasix cost about cost issues related to clobazam. However, hangover severity can get cheap diflucan best price tablet vary depending on factors such as alcohol tolerance, hydration levels, lumigan online and personal physiology. FDA-approved EPS containers should have microwave-safe labels cialis india to show they have been tested and are safe for sale artane use in microwaves. In cases of MRSA, a doctor will buy cialis no prescription required need to use alternative medications that are effective against antibiotic-resistant buy quinine infections. It also collects information about the health of babies buy generic diovan cost work born to people who have had Cimzia treatment. This helps retin-a tablet prevent your skin from becoming too sensitive and reduces the buy clomid pills risk of injection site reactions such as pain. The link buy synthroid may stem from several factors, such as the physical effects lowest price for diovan of lupus and the multiple ongoing challenges of living with buy cheap amikacin online a chronic condition. If someone prefers not to explain the purchase cheap clindamycin online canada condition in detail, loved ones can also learn by reading online.

On page 216 of the book, we joke that DMCA might stand for “Digital Millennium Competition Avoidance” rather than “‚Ķ Copyright Act.” The idea is that if a company puts a digital lock on any interface to its equipment, then the anti-circumvention provision of the DMCA makes it illegal for an maker of accessories to reverse-engineer the lock to figure out how to make a compatible accessory. Apple Computer has given us a classic example of this technique.

If you walk into any electronics store or any WalMarts, you’ll find lots of earphones that you can use with your iPod, in case you lose the ones it came with, or they don’t fit your ears, or whatever. The earphones are on the racks with slipcovers and lots of other non-Apple stuff that accessorizes iPods. Of course you can buy Apple earphones, but maybe you’d rather buy the ones that fit better.

Well, Apple wants you to buy Apple earphones. The way the capitalist world is supposed to work, Apple is supposed to achieve that by making better earphones, or by cutting its prices. Everyone else has the same incentives, and the consumer wins from the competition.

Oh, not in the America of the DMCA. Apple has engineered the new iPod Shuffle so that the replacement headphones won’t work unless they have built into them an “authentication chip” the headphone maker can get only from Apple. Now the headphone maker is prohibited by law from trying to figure out what the “authentication chip” does so it can make headphones you can just plug into the Shuffle without, in essence, asking Apple’s permission and paying Apple money. So Apple winds up controlling the headphone market.

A classic case of copyright law being put to a use that has nothing at all to do with the protection of books or music or images — just to kill competition, to the advantage of one company and to the plain disadvantage of the public.

Thanks to Fred von Lohmann of the Electronic Frontier Foundation for raising a stink.

Comments are closed.