People buy viagra internet should look for adjustable beds that make it easier to cheapest lasix turn the individual around to reduce the risk of bed buy cheap ampicillin sores. This can become challenging for people with cardiovascular disease generic griseofulvin info who require aspirin as a blood thinner to prevent blood tetracycline without prescription clots. This response can further contribute to the progression of buy azor alternatives info damage and inflammation seen in conditions such as MS.Necroptosis is alesse (ovral l) online typically a tightly regulated process, and under normal circumstances, the methotrexate side effects pill body has mechanisms to prevent excessive or inappropriate cell death. discount viagra without prescription If a person does not have any on hand, they cheap celexa can easily substitute it with another common ingredient. Retropharyngeal abscesses discount cafergot can cause pain and discomfort when the neck extends, which buy gentamicin eye drops without prescription may happen during a yawn. Tracking this is essential to pyrantel pamoate no prescription the rhythm method, as sperm can fertilize an egg at any.

This is the sole case of copyright infringement by downloading that had actually gone to trial, prior to the case of Joel Tenenbaum in which Professor Charles Nesson is active. The Thomas case, which we discuss on page 198, is being re-tried after the judge threw out the first decision. Today Thomas’s expert, Prof. Yongdae Kim of the University of Minnesota, filed his report, which includes a strong attack on the evidence against Thomas and also on the report of the opposing expert. The site “RIAA v. the People” has a good summary, and a hotlink to Kim’s full report. For me the killer sentence is this:

MediaSentry claims to have much experience in identifying individual committing copyright infringement. However, they insist that their methods are proprietary and thus cannot be subject to scrutiny by an impartial third party. No academic studies exist of their internal investigative techniques, methods, software, data collection practices, or even employee training in retaining collected data in a way that would allow for it to be used as evidence at a trial.

MediaSentry is the private police force of the RIAA, of which Nesson also complains. How on earth can one defend oneself against a private investigator who makes a claim about what you did but says that its methodology for gathering the evidence is proprietary and even the judge can’t review it?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, March 3rd, 2009 at 11:22 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.