Blown To Bits

Best wishes, Chris Soghoian

Tuesday, March 31st, 2009 by Harry Lewis
With viagra free delivery photosensitivity, exposure to the sun or other UV light sources find cheap amoxicillin online while taking Esbriet may cause a reaction. A doctor can buy clomid determine the cause of the symptoms and recommend the most cheapest viagra side effects dose appropriate treatment, such as antibiotics. It is important to understand purchase generic estrace side effects and alcohol that surgery for metastatic GISTs — even as part of viagra for order a treatment plan — does not provide a cure. Antibiotics, triamterene in bangkok pain control medication, and replenishment of fluids can be useful purchase cialis without prescription for treating small bowel obstructions. Therefore, researchers must validate findings buy cheapest advair from murine studies in clinical trials and test for efficacy atrovent no prescription before applying them to humans. Some cancer treatments, such as mirapex no prescription chemotherapy and radiation therapy, can damage the cells in the buy cheap alesse (ovral l) online bone marrow. While microwave ovens use a type of radiation cialis professional to heat food, they do not make the food itself dexamethasone online radioactive. If you have insurance, your insurance provider can answer specific.

Chris Soghoian is a smart, relentless privacy advocate and activist. I’ve cited him half a dozen times in this blog (use the search box). He has done a lot of dirty work for print media as well. He’s a grad student at Indiana and a Fellow at the Berkman Center, where I have gotten to know him. He’s a guy you definitely want on your side in an argument. For example, he just took on the recording and movie industries in an FTC hearing about the loss that consumers can suffer if their cloud music or movie supplier goes out of business and takes the bits down with them.

A few weeks ago he pointed out that the decision of the Obama administration to use YouTube had privacy consequences — there was a risk that Google could track who was watching presidential addresses, for example. The first post on this subject was called¬†Why Obama should ditch YouTube, and several others followed. Both the White House and Google were apparently furious, but the White House changed its practices shortly afterwards.

Now CNet, the online news service that sponsored Chris’s blog, has fired him. No explanation, but it’s almost surely because he annoyed some powerful institutions. Here is Chris’s own comments on this, and here is a comment by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

This is not good. We’ve lost an important voice. Even more, the case raises big worries about the independence of the new media. Chris’s stuff is edgy, and it’s no surprise that his exploits irritate people. But what did CNet think it was getting when it published a blog entitled “Surveillance State”? And on this story at least, the denouncements that followed were denials of things that Chris’s stories never said. I am not aware that he was caught making any mistakes. So please imagine the Washington Post firing Woodward and Bernstein after they started printing embarrassing stuff about the Watergate burglary.

I wish him well. We’ll be hearing from him again, I’m sure. And on the bright side, maybe he’ll finish his PhD now. But I wish he were still up on a visible site making trouble in his informed, funny way.

3 Responses to “Best wishes, Chris Soghoian”

  1. foo Says:

    Chris Soghoian was fired from CNet because he posted an article under factually incorrect headline: “White House ditches YouTube after privacy complaints”.

    The notion that he “almost surely because he annoyed some powerful institutions” by writing about cookies is unsubstantiated nonsense.

  2. Daniel Says:

    To think that CNet would fire such a popular and outspoken evangelist because of a debatably ‘factually incorrect’ headline is equally ludicrous, foo. Furthermore, the nature of the line “No explanation, but it‚Äôs almost surely because he annoyed some powerful institutions” is inherently speculative, and therefor does not require substantiation.

    All that being said, I would like to know more about why he was fired, and find it curious that he hasn’t been more outspoken about it himself, on his own blog.

  3. Graham Says:

    Above points are good, but note that CNET was acquired by Viacom/CBS News not long ago. The mothership company wasn’t there when Chris was brought on as a blogger.