Blown To Bits

The President as the Commander-in-chief of Cybersecurity

Friday, April 3rd, 2009 by Harry Lewis
You cheapest tetracycline should always consult your doctor or another healthcare professional before discount betnovate taking any medication. Keeping pets away from the bedroom can buying cheap robaxin alternatives professional significantly reduce the quantity of this allergen in someone's bedroom, cheap prescription without consultation spiriva order reducing the risk of irritation that may otherwise occur overnight. artane online However, some doctors may suggest follow-up surveillance if a person where to order ampicillin has multiple hyperplastic polyps or if they are large. NHL lowest price for compazine is a cancer that develops in a type of white mirapex without prescription blood cells known as lymphocytes, which help the immune system cheapest methotrexate fight cancer and microbes. If a person's FMD causes them discount t-ject 60 to experience arterial dissection, a doctor may treat it with lumigan online review anticoagulation medications. Someone can make this hair mask by either buy remeron without prescription mashing the ripe fruits or blending them with melted coconut zyprexa generic order oil and applying them to damp hair. However, this article quinine without prescription should not be used as a substitute for the knowledge and.

A draft cybersecurity bill empowers the president to commandeer the Internet under vaguely specified circumstances:

The President … may declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network …

Now the Internet is inherently hard to control, because of its distributed architecture, and the vast numbers of private and governmental parties, spread across the globe. I wonder what would actually happen if he gave the order. The language of the bill also states that the President

may order the disconnection of any Federal government or United States critical infrastructure information systems or networks in the interest of national security,

which may sound reasonable until you recall how capacious “national security” interests can be — broad enough that allowing the American public to see the draft of an anti-music-piracy trade agreement drafted with the assistance of the RIAA is also considered a national security threat. By that standard, the President could cut off your Internet connection if he though you were a file-sharing risk.

There is, moreover, a category of “Federal government and¬†private sector owned critical infrastructure information¬†systems and networks.” These are not defined in the proposed statute — the President (surprise) gets to say which systems and networks are “critical.” The bill then gives the government complete access to everything about them:

The Secretary of Commerce shall have access to all relevant data concerning such networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access.

Now I am guessing that the Internet backbone would be critical, don’t you think? Pretty much all traffic flows through the backbone, so it seems this clause may with one stroke of a pen invalidate ALL privacy laws and protections relating to electronic communications.

There is a lot in this bill to like — it calls for important research and creates some emergency-response structures that are likely to be more good than threatening. There is also much to make one suspicious — it leads with appeals to the economic importance of the Internet, and talks about “intellectual property” long before it mentions “banks.” But the worst seems to me in these few lines, where the drafters, our elected representatives, have said, “The government can seize control of it all and can look at everything.” So much for Congress checking the power of the executive to monitor and interfere with the communications of citizens!

Comments are closed.