Eating buy cheap betnovate online disorders can severely affect the quality of life of people tablet allopurinol living with these conditions and those close to them. This buy kenalog creates complex issues, as people have different beliefs about what toradol for sale constitutes the start of human life. A physician might refer buy cheap diflucan online usa those with longer-lasting, severe, or movement-restricting pain for physical therapy. accutane for sale When an organization includes certain drugs in treatment guidelines, it cheapest gentamicin eye drops means research has shown the drug to be safe and buy accutane once daily effective. If you're sexually active and you or your partner metronidazole gel online can become pregnant, talk with your doctor about your birth buy discount diclofenac control needs while you're taking Jakafi. However, the cheek has cialis tablet no cartilage, so piercing this site may cause people to feel.

Today’s news brings a nice juxtaposition.

A new law in South Korea would require those who run web sites to get and retain identifying information about the people who post on their sites. Google, which has been criticized in the past for complying with the demands of authoritarian regimes for information about its users, took the extreme step of disallowing all YouTube uploads and comments in Korea. Bravo — this will cost Google some market share, and may put pressure on the government. (Or perhaps not. YouTube is not the leading video site in Korea.) The government feels dissed and is saying as much to Google.

But today also reminds us that sometimes people using the Internet really are criminals and we are glad they are leaving electronic fingerprints behind. A series of assaults on women around Boston was solved very quickly because the alleged perpetrator was incautious enough to send an email from his home to one of his victims. Detectives obtained his IP address from the ISP and started to surveil his house. Security videos at the several crime scenes showed him tapping on his Blackberry; that was another good source of electronic forensics. (How many people could have used the same Blackberry from the three locations at the same times as the video camera showed this gentleman keeping busy?)

The two stories are not incompatible. Such records could be kept for a few weeks for police purposes and then discarded so they won’t be used for mischievous purposes later. Societies lose something by keeping data, and also lose something by deleting it. It’s just a question of making the right tradeoffs.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009 at 4:50 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.