Blown To Bits

DOJ Questions the Google Books Settlement

Friday, July 3rd, 2009 by Harry Lewis
Healthcare metronidazole gel without prescription professionals may also use a central line for individuals who buy tetracycline no prescription required need medications that could cause phlebitis (inflammation) or hardening (sclerosis). buy amikacin without prescription Mutations in genes that manage cell growth, division, and death purchase cheap viagra low cost consultation could play a role in lymphoma development. To learn more atrovent without a prescription about whether Remicade or Humira may be a better option flagyl online stores for you, talk with your doctor. Doctors can refer people purchase cheap retin-a without prescription india to other healthcare specialists, such as those who specialize in buy cephalexin pills mental health. How much Botox or Topamax costs depends on drug atrovent online purchase the treatment plan your doctor prescribes, your insurance plan, and order zoloft from us your pharmacy. Hot flashes can cause someone to feel hot discount cialis overnight delivery in their upper body, which may also cause red or aldactone for sale blotchy patches on the skin. One type of electrodiagnostic test buy diovan without prescription is electromyography (EMG), which involves inserting needles attached to an cheap spiriva no prescription EMG machine into a muscle. There is limited research on whether.

The Department of Justice has now confirmed rumors that it was taking an interest in the draft settlement between Google and the Authors and Publishers, now before federal judge Denny Chin (who just sentenced Bernie Madoff to 150 years). Presumably the question for the DOJ is whether the proposed settlement is anti-competitive; Google responds “It‚Äôs important to note that this agreement is non-exclusive and if approved by the court, stands to expand access to millions of books in the U.S.‚Äù Which is true, but may well not be sufficient to avoid anti-trust issues.¬†¬†See the Digital Daily post here, which includes a link to the actual correspondence between the government and Judge Chin. Judge Chin notes that he is still planning to hold a Fairness hearing on October 7, and if the government wants its views known in writing, it has to submit something by September 18.

Comments are closed.