During buy erythromycin low cheap price each check, a person should measure their blood pressure two betnovate online times with a minute break between each reading. The Achilles synthroid for sale tendon is the thickest in the body and attaches the robaxin muscle at the back of the calf to the heel purchase compazine best price professional bone. This means there is some potential risk to the zyprexa cheap fetus, but the benefits of NRT may outweigh the risks metronidazole gel sale for some pregnant people. Even if two drugs treat the buy cheap (ovral online canada same condition or are in the same drug class, your remeron bangkok body can still respond differently. However, the severity of complications buy no rx cialis varies from person to person and depends heavily on the gentamicin eye drops online stores type of SCD a person has. The drug information contained buy cipro without prescription herein is subject to change and is not intended to generic xalatan cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions,.

The state of Illinois has enacted a law prohibiting anyone classified as a sex offender from using any social networking site. The definition of the latter is quite complicated — it certainly covers more than Facebook and Myspace. Blogs may qualify as well. The language is hard to parse.

I understand the impulse, but this looks like another blunt instrument designed in a moment of panic, like the Child Online Protection Act we discuss in Chapter 7 of Blown to Bits.¬†¬†Andrew Moshirnia argues that it’s probably unconstitutional as other such laws have proved to be — it simply restricts too much speech that doesn’t need restriction in order to get at the subset that is actually objectionable. Moshirnia points out two other minor problems: it won’t work (it’s too easy to create a fake identity online) and sex offender registries are overbroad (read my other book, Excellence Without a Soul, if you’d like to see how one Harvard undergraduate earned his status on the list). Then there’s the fact, abundantly documented in the Internet Safety Technical Task Force report, that the Internet is not the enabler of sex crimes that politicians love to pretend it is.

Go after the crimes, not the tools. The fact that some people can use their liberty for evil ends is no reason to restrict anyone’s liberty pointlessly.

This entry was posted on Thursday, August 20th, 2009 at 4:05 pm and is filed under Security, Social computing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.