Many cheap levitra adults may not be able to effectively treat the condition buy generic clomid using nonsurgical or natural options. This can help prevent the order cialis on internet condition from worsening, as the separated piece of bone and discount cephalexin the cartilage surrounding it may begin to crack and loosen order buy low price drugs over time. Specific exercises and stretches may help restore proper buy cheap nexium functioning to the joints affected by the condition. Natural treatments, sale discount buy such as rest, immobilization, and movement therapy, may be beneficial accutane online for people who do not require surgery and as complementary buy nexium online treatments in combination with surgery. The researchers also point to sale ampicillin a lack of high quality studies on the efficacy and buy without a prescription safety of acupuncture for this bone condition. Researchers do not flovent without prescription completely understand the underlying mechanisms behind the potential benefits of buy atarax online acupuncture for osteoporosis. The acupuncturist will then insert fine needles buying amoxicillin online into specific points, either just under the skin or deeper into.

That is thee title of a superb column by Pamela Samuelson explaining some (but only some) of the worries about the proposed settlement of copyright infringement claims against Google for scanning copyrighted works. She explains the perverse incentives to both parties to this litigation. In a word, each realized that they could become literary monopolists if they played their cards right with each other.

That is exactly the reason why the federal judiciary gets involved in settlements that private parties have negotiated with each other in class action cases. There is too much risk that the parties will find a way to divide the pie between themselves in a way that does not serve the public well.

And, of course, the public would gain much from the settlement. Advocates for the disabled are urging the judge to approve it because it would expand access to works that can be mechanically vocalized. And so it would, at a huge cost o competition, openness, privacy, and various other pitfalls.

It may not matter, if the Department of Justice decides the settlement has serious anti-trust implications, as it certainly seems to. (You can read the DOJ’s curt letter to Google at that site, thanks to DocStoc.)

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 11th, 2009 at 2:51 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.