These zyprexa prescription findings can help identify communities at the highest risk of canada cialis adverse outcomes from poor diet to determine future strategies toward canada online reaching health equality. When someone has low white blood cell discount prednisolone no rx counts, they have a higher risk of getting infections and buy generic nexium illness. According to the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute order tetracycline (NHLBI), eating a balanced diet and limiting excess alcohol may buy metronidazole gel without prescription help prevent a type of low white blood cell count buy cheapest cialis on line called lymphopenia. Generally, a person needs to speak with a buy viagra online cheap registered dietitian to help address nutritional needs and increase white generic gel no prescription jelly cell counts. If underlying diseases, such as HIV, or infections cheapest estrace affect a person's white blood cells, treating them can help. tetracycline without prescription People with early signs of kidney disease should talk with buy generic diclofenac a doctor or dietician about implementing a kidney disease diet. find accutane on internet People who are overweight or have obesity should lose weight to.

That is thee title of a superb column by Pamela Samuelson explaining some (but only some) of the worries about the proposed settlement of copyright infringement claims against Google for scanning copyrighted works. She explains the perverse incentives to both parties to this litigation. In a word, each realized that they could become literary monopolists if they played their cards right with each other.

That is exactly the reason why the federal judiciary gets involved in settlements that private parties have negotiated with each other in class action cases. There is too much risk that the parties will find a way to divide the pie between themselves in a way that does not serve the public well.

And, of course, the public would gain much from the settlement. Advocates for the disabled are urging the judge to approve it because it would expand access to works that can be mechanically vocalized. And so it would, at a huge cost o competition, openness, privacy, and various other pitfalls.

It may not matter, if the Department of Justice decides the settlement has serious anti-trust implications, as it certainly seems to. (You can read the DOJ’s curt letter to Google at that site, thanks to DocStoc.)

This entry was posted on Tuesday, August 11th, 2009 at 2:51 pm and is filed under Open Access, Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.