Blown To Bits

The FTC Decides to Regulate Bloggers

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
A order cialis no rx person can determine levels of various substances in the blood, buy acomplia online such as nutrient levels and cell counts. Biohackers may use buy generic clonidine biotechnology to inform their experiments, but the two are not order cost mutually exclusive. There are several areas of biohacking that relate cheap low price to the field of slowing or countering the effects of order accutane aging. Some types of biohacking have produced effective results, such erythromycin prescription as certain applications of nutrigenomics, while other experimentations have failed. order asacol Also, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) suggest cheapest tizanidine that the Moderna vaccine may offer better long lasting protection find buy online than other vaccines. The Moderna vaccine is also effective against variants,.

We have a very well-intentioned initiative from the Federal Trade Commission to require people who blog about a product reveal if they have a financial interest in the product’s success. No phony “product reviews,” for example, written by people who are being paid by the manufacturer.

This is a classic case of that with which the road to hell is paved. The FTC is attempting to translate conventions used in TV and print into a very different medium. There are so many edge cases to consider. What about a 14 year old blogger raving about a skateboard her daddy brought home from the company where he works? What about a book reviewer who reviews a book he was given to review (as reviewers invariably are)? What about just mentioning that you are drinking a Coke when your brother-in-law works for the Coca-Cola company? What about tweets–do you have to include your disclosure in the 140 word limit (the FTC commissioner apparently thinks that might be possible).

And the big question: Is this really a role we want for government?

Many good blog posts on this. I recommend Dan Gillmor’s, and those to which he points. Dan proposes that the FTC just doesn’t understand the Web.

Comments are closed.