Blown To Bits

The FTC Decides to Regulate Bloggers

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
Herpes cheap alesse (ovral l) ulcers typically occur as fluid-filled blisters that can appear around cheap amoxicillin the mouth and genitals. One study found that frankincense was cheap cialis from canada effective in reducing the appearance of scarring and stretch marks ventolin order on a person's skin. A hiatal hernia occurs if the ampicillin online sale upper section of the stomach, or another internal organ, bulges cost flagyl through the hiatus. The drug information contained herein is subject arcoxia online to change and is not intended to cover all possible zoloft without prescription uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse atrovent sale effects. The most common causes of hemorrhagic shock are deep order discount retin-a online effects cuts, gunshot wounds, trauma, and penetrative injuries. During the frozen buying generic remeron and thawing stages, these exercises intensify, and the goals shift buy celexa online to restoring joint mobility. Scientists are studying other ways to order viagra detect stomach cancer before it causes symptoms to improve outcomes. generic viagra info For example, if the "heat" of a drug is less allopurinol sale than the "coldness" of a disease, it will not work.The researcher.

We have a very well-intentioned initiative from the Federal Trade Commission to require people who blog about a product reveal if they have a financial interest in the product’s success. No phony “product reviews,” for example, written by people who are being paid by the manufacturer.

This is a classic case of that with which the road to hell is paved. The FTC is attempting to translate conventions used in TV and print into a very different medium. There are so many edge cases to consider. What about a 14 year old blogger raving about a skateboard her daddy brought home from the company where he works? What about a book reviewer who reviews a book he was given to review (as reviewers invariably are)? What about just mentioning that you are drinking a Coke when your brother-in-law works for the Coca-Cola company? What about tweets–do you have to include your disclosure in the 140 word limit (the FTC commissioner apparently thinks that might be possible).

And the big question: Is this really a role we want for government?

Many good blog posts on this. I recommend Dan Gillmor’s, and those to which he points. Dan proposes that the FTC just doesn’t understand the Web.

Comments are closed.