For buy lasix without prescription Dr. Eckman, the tool may prove most valuable as a cheapest griseofulvin means of tracking the health and progress of a person order prozac low price drugs with diabetes. When a person completes their treatment, a doctor generic viagra side effects and alcohol may still want to closely monitor them, so it is buy generic accutane important to attend all follow-up appointments. The diversion of blood viagra tablet to the heart and brain causes people to feel weak, buy zoloft online particularly in the arms and legs. Do not use Amjevita discount cialis online if it has accidentally frozen while in the refrigerator, even purchase acomplia online if it has been thawed. However, the EPA states that norvasc online stores glyphosate may pose ecological risks to aquatic and terrestrial plants, ventolin online stores birds, mammals, and honeybees. People should seek immediate emergency help if.

We have a very well-intentioned initiative from the Federal Trade Commission to require people who blog about a product reveal if they have a financial interest in the product’s success. No phony “product reviews,” for example, written by people who are being paid by the manufacturer.

This is a classic case of that with which the road to hell is paved. The FTC is attempting to translate conventions used in TV and print into a very different medium. There are so many edge cases to consider. What about a 14 year old blogger raving about a skateboard her daddy brought home from the company where he works? What about a book reviewer who reviews a book he was given to review (as reviewers invariably are)? What about just mentioning that you are drinking a Coke when your brother-in-law works for the Coca-Cola company? What about tweets–do you have to include your disclosure in the 140 word limit (the FTC commissioner apparently thinks that might be possible).

And the big question: Is this really a role we want for government?

Many good blog posts on this. I recommend Dan Gillmor’s, and those to which he points. Dan proposes that the FTC just doesn’t understand the Web.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 at 9:38 pm and is filed under The Internet and the Web, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.