These buy cheap order online usa are first-line medications that help manage the symptoms of seizure generic cheapest no prescription jelly disorders, such as epilepsy. Experts indicate that prevention through vaccination buy generic advair no prescription usa may be the most viable option for the best outlook. buy buy online However, the findings indicate an association between typical sun exposure buy artane online and shingles in males but not females. An endoscopy, where norvasc sale the doctor inserts a thin tube with a camera on find discount no prescription required it, may help them assess the throat in more detail. order professional If a person has never had chickenpox or shingles and order atarax low price drugs comes into contact with blister fluid, they can contract the buy cheapest buy alternative virus and develop chickenpox. However, if the side effects last purchase atenolol online longer than that, bother you, or become severe, be sure discount estrace vaginal cream to talk with your doctor or pharmacist. If you have questions.

We have a very well-intentioned initiative from the Federal Trade Commission to require people who blog about a product reveal if they have a financial interest in the product’s success. No phony “product reviews,” for example, written by people who are being paid by the manufacturer.

This is a classic case of that with which the road to hell is paved. The FTC is attempting to translate conventions used in TV and print into a very different medium. There are so many edge cases to consider. What about a 14 year old blogger raving about a skateboard her daddy brought home from the company where he works? What about a book reviewer who reviews a book he was given to review (as reviewers invariably are)? What about just mentioning that you are drinking a Coke when your brother-in-law works for the Coca-Cola company? What about tweets–do you have to include your disclosure in the 140 word limit (the FTC commissioner apparently thinks that might be possible).

And the big question: Is this really a role we want for government?

Many good blog posts on this. I recommend Dan Gillmor’s, and those to which he points. Dan proposes that the FTC just doesn’t understand the Web.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 at 9:38 pm and is filed under The Internet and the Web, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.