Blown To Bits

The FTC Decides to Regulate Bloggers

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009 by Harry Lewis
People tizanidine india with either type of steatohepatitis can have no symptoms for buy cheap allopurinol extended periods, although some may experience discomfort and pain in cialis tablets their abdomen. It's a biosimilar of adalimumab (Humira), which is retin-a without rx a treatment option for RA recommended in guidelines from the atrovent for sale American College of Rheumatology. While CBD oil may help with gentamicin eye drops online stores nausea, it will likely be less effective than prescription cannabinoid-containing viagra pills medications. By contrast, studies indicate an association between higher vitamin purchase cheap atarax sale dangers D levels and prostate cancer and perhaps pancreatic cancer. If buying generic viagra a person has shingles symptoms while pregnant, they need to cheap zyprexa samples talk with a healthcare professional for diagnosis and treatment. However, generic viagra sale information a doctor may not recommend drinking a lot of water sale viagra if a person has certain conditions, such as kidney failure order cheapest remeron dose or heart disease. People should keep their nails short and buy discount celexa sale jelly consider wearing cotton gloves or protective coverings while sleeping. Doctors may.

We have a very well-intentioned initiative from the Federal Trade Commission to require people who blog about a product reveal if they have a financial interest in the product’s success. No phony “product reviews,” for example, written by people who are being paid by the manufacturer.

This is a classic case of that with which the road to hell is paved. The FTC is attempting to translate conventions used in TV and print into a very different medium. There are so many edge cases to consider. What about a 14 year old blogger raving about a skateboard her daddy brought home from the company where he works? What about a book reviewer who reviews a book he was given to review (as reviewers invariably are)? What about just mentioning that you are drinking a Coke when your brother-in-law works for the Coca-Cola company? What about tweets–do you have to include your disclosure in the 140 word limit (the FTC commissioner apparently thinks that might be possible).

And the big question: Is this really a role we want for government?

Many good blog posts on this. I recommend Dan Gillmor’s, and those to which he points. Dan proposes that the FTC just doesn’t understand the Web.

Comments are closed.