If flovent online stores you and your doctor determine that Pertzye is safe and buy clozapine effective for you, you'll likely take it long term. Applying aldactone generic a layer of pure petroleum jelly.Covering the rash with a buy generic clozapine new, sterile, and nonstick bandage.Washing the hands after touching the purchase lipitor without prescription rash to avoid spreading shingles to others.A person should perform drug levitra these steps every day until the rash clears. They may buy cheap remeron ask about symptoms the person is experiencing, such as difficulty cialis buy with eating or digestion. A person should speak with their free cialis insurance provider before the procedure to see how much they buy atenolol will cover for the test. If an individual has plasmacytoma cheap cialis tablets or multiple myeloma, supportive care may help improve their quality of.

The Wall Street Journal (story here; subscription needed) reports that Wikipedia is losing editors faster than it is recruiting new ones. Since about the beginning of 2008, departures have exceeded arrivals in the corps of volunteers who contribute to Wikipedia and scour it for accuracy–or in some cases, opportunities for petty vandalism.

It’s hard to know exactly what’s going on, and the Journal raises several possibilities without claiming it knows what is true. The original editors have been at it for almost a decade; perhaps they have burned out. Perhaps all the easy and interesting stories have been written; there isn’t much new to say about Crime and Punishment within Wikipedia’s stylistic strictures. (In fact if you check that entry’s history, it was modified only 10 days ago, but only to reverse some act of vandalism.) Can it be that from the standpoint of the totality of human knowledge, Wikipedia editing has now reached a state of diminishing returns? Also, perhaps, it is not so much fun as it used to be; there are more rules to follow, and more people checking on your edits, than there used to be.

It’s an important question. Wikipedia is one great success of crowdsourcing, of a useful artifact produced using the lunatic fringe of democratic participation. What if the model is unsustainable after awhile, because at some point there are more people who have their fun as trolls than there are as builders?

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 24th, 2009 at 10:45 pm and is filed under Social computing. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.