Researchers buy celebrex online suggest that higher sugar consumption in those with ADHD could order discount cheapest online effects be an effect of impulsivity or hyperactivity. However, research in artane no rx required this review offers mixed and inconclusive results about whether ginkgo zoloft online biloba could improve memory, attention, and other cognitive factors. Aside estradiol valerate no prescription from caffeine, research on the efficacy of supplements as cognitive prednisolone online stores enhancements provides mixed and inconclusive results. People should discuss taking amikacin online stores supplements with their doctor or a healthcare professional, such as 60 side effects pill a nurse or registered dietitian, to ensure they are not viagra pill endangering themselves. While the ingredients in a variety of supplements buy buy online australia have properties that researchers link to better cognitive function, the find atrovent evidence of their efficacy in supplement form is often inconclusive. zoloft for sale Behavior counseling helps teach children and parents certain techniques to improve.

In an editorial published on December 13, the Globe takes the risky position of decrying the penalties of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as “draconian” and the law itself as lacking “common sense” in the area of music downloading. Risky because, of course, the Globe and the New York Times depend on the law to protect their own content. Of course they do not, as the music industry does, take teenagers to court for making copies of their copyrighted content. But that hasn’t stopped the stream of vicious comments about the Globe’s hypocrisy.

The editorial is in response to the trial of Joel Tenenbaum and Judge Nancy Gertner’s plaint to Congress to do something about the “travesty” of justice (the Globe’s word). The paper wonders aloud whether Professor Charles Nesson, who represented Tanenbaum, helped his cause by the defense he took — claiming that music file sharing was allowed under “fair use.” That’s a stretch that even the most libertarian thinkers haven’t endorsed.

What’s interesting to me about the editorial is the reactions. Of course one never knows who the commenters are; they could all be music industry lackeys, for all we know. Still, we have here a defense of big business against a powerless individual — some people even compared him to Madoff, since in each case their crimes were committed with a few keystrokes. There is some amplification of power that people see in the control of digital information that makes them lose all sense of perspective and proportion. I don’t think the same people would think $675,000 was a reasonable fine if Tenenbaum had stolen a CD from a store.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, December 15th, 2009 at 10:57 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.