The order discount amoxicillin online effects company claims its tea is free from gluten and genetically cialis non prescription modified organisms (GMOs) and certified organic by the United States buying celexa Department of Agriculture (USDA). The radiation therapist may put small buying generic viagra marks on the person's skin to show where to direct cheap atrovent from uk the energy beams. An intestinal infection due to the bacteria purchase free cipro low price australia Clostridioides difficile has been reported in clinical trials of Augmentin. pharmacy griseofulvin Doctors commonly recommend Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) and cheap cialis from canada Mediterranean diets for managing gout. Healthcare professionals may prescribe anticoagulant order tizanidine medication if an arrhythmia, in particular atrial fibrillation, puts a buy generic acomplia person at risk of clots or stroke from clots. A buy discount cialis without prescription info healthcare professional can direct someone to mental health resources and purchase generic allopurinol prescription delivery get them started on the most beneficial treatment. The condition xalatan low price typically occurs when a person's tears do not work as they.

I wrote in Blown to Bits about Google’s decision to do business in China, in spite of the need for censorship at the direction of the Chinese regime, notwithstanding Google’s mission statement about making information universally accessible. I thought this was the wrong decision, and I have argued that position publicly (winning against Esther Dyson, among others).

Google has now announced that in light of massive cyber-attacks on its servers from China, including attacks aimed at compromising the Gmail accounts of Chinese dissidents, it is reconsidering its decision to censor, and is even asking whether it can continue doing business in China at all.

These attacks and the surveillance they have uncovered–combined with the attempts over the past year to further limit free speech on the web–have led us to conclude that we should review the feasibility of our business operations in China. We have decided we are no longer willing to continue censoring our results on Google.cn, and so over the next few weeks we will be discussing with the Chinese government the basis on which we could operate an unfiltered search engine within the law, if at all. We recognize that this may well mean having to shut down Google.cn, and potentially our offices in China.

This is a huge decision. While I disagreed with Google’s decision to cooperate with the Chinese censors, I respected the fact that they couldn’t lightly walk away from the biggest business opportunity in the world. I also respected the fact that even the limited search they were offering enlightened many people about things of which they would not otherwise be aware (except that they could always use Baidu, the Chinese search engine).

So Google gets lots of credit for their promise to monitor the information freedom conditions in China and for standing on the principle that even if cooperation with evil is sometimes justified in the interest of a larger good, there are limits, and China has breached those limits.

In the war for digital liberty, chalk this up as a battle won for freedom.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 12th, 2010 at 10:48 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, Search, The Internet and the Web. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.