Blown To Bits

Is It Illegal to Record an Arrest?

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
People buy generic clonidine should always discuss using CBD products with a healthcare professional cialis buy to ensure the product will not interact with any existing levitra cost prescription and nonprescription medication or health conditions. Gender is based gel vendors on how someone identifies, while sex refers to biological characteristics, discount synthroid such as genitalia. People may continue to have flares in fda approved cialis relation to changing progesterone levels until they reach menopause. These petcam (metacam) oral suspension for sale can include practicing good sleep hygiene and avoiding certain activities quinine online close to bedtime, such as smoking and consuming alcohol. Ovarian generic augmentin stromal cell tumors are ovarian cancers that develop in the buy cheap viagra without prescription stromal cells, which hold the ovaries together. In FDEIA, eating generic compazine while exercising or eating the food on its own does buy cheap ventolin not trigger an allergic reaction on its own, but the nasonex without prescription combination of physical exertion and eating the culprit food together buy metronidazole gel without prescription can result in anaphylaxis. Essentially, compounds in grapefruit prevent the drug tizanidine online purchase body from metabolizing statins normally, which increases their concentration in a.

Depends on who you talk to.

In Blown to Bits, we talk about citizen vigilantism—people taking vengeance on people they see doing bad things, or just snapping pictures of crimes being committed, pictures that may help identify the culprits. The digital explosion has engendered a lot more of this, for both better and worse—we once did not all have cameras on us all the time.

Of course, a technology generation later, we all have not just still cameras, but audio recorders and video cameras too—in cell phones and even iPods. And people are whipping them out when they observe arrests being made, and are using the recordings to embarrass the the police, or to help in the defense of the party being arrested.

Except now, as the Boston Globe reports,  the police are increasingly fighting back, accusing those making the recordings of illegal surveillance, under wiretapping statutes. It’s a fascinating story. Some of the convictions are standing up in Massachusetts—the Supreme Judicial Court ruled in a split decision that the wiretapping statutes apply, unless the recording was made in a public manner. So people hiding the microphone in their sleeve or the camera in their coat may well be in trouble. Chief Justice Margaret Marshall was in the minority, opining

Citizens have a particularly important role to play when the official conduct at issue is that of the police. Their role cannot be performed if citizens must fear criminal reprisals when they seek to hold government officials responsible by recording, secretly recording on occasion, an interaction between a citizen and a police officer.

I don’t envy the police their job. Hell, I wouldn’t be happy if people were video-recording my  every movement while I was doing my job. But what the police are doing while making an arrest seems to me a public act by definition. In other situations (all those traffic-stop videos we see) the police themselves make sure everything is recorded these days. Can’t see why recording the police arresting someone in the public square wouldn’t fall within citizens’ rights.

Comments are closed.