“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine
Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
You buying cheapest amikacin effects can also refer to these articles about Xeljanz and Humira tetracycline prescription or talk with your doctor or pharmacist. An individual may order norvasc overnight delivery need long-term care due to a variety of circumstances, such dangers cheapest methotrexate get as a chronic illness, accident, or advanced aging. Doctors can remeron sale also help people with painful menstrual cramps determine whether there order clomid lowest price dosage is an underlying medical cause, such as endometriosis. The FDA zithromax prescription are the agency responsible for approving and legalizing drugs in purchase artane online the U.S. For a drug to gain FDA approval, the discount cialis without prescription company that make it must send certain information to the cephalexin for order FDA. Following a radical prostatectomy, a person will need to wait.
That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.
The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.