Blown To Bits

“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine

Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
Most buy prozac online cases occurred in teenage and young adult males* who were purchase generic no rx taking azathioprine (Azasan, Imuran) or mercaptopurine (Purinethol, Purixan) in combination cheap bentyl with a TNF blocker. Amjevita expiration, storage, and disposalWhen you buy generic buy best price get Amjevita from the pharmacy, the pharmacist will add an clomid without prescription expiration date to the label on the packaging. This helps cheap buy from canada prevent others, including children and pets, from taking the drug alesse (ovral l) online stores by accident or harming themselves with the needle. The drug order discount bangkok online information contained herein is subject to change and is not buy tablets intended to cover all possible uses, directions, precautions, warnings, drug buy cheap triamterene online interactions, allergic reactions, or adverse effects. Doctors do not consider buy alternative UC a life threatening condition, and life expectancy is typical clindamycin gel prescription for most individuals. When a person receives a diagnosis at estrace vaginal cream without prescription early onset, symptoms are typically more severe, with more inflammation atrovent for order across the body. Although scientists have developed several treatment options for.

That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.

The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.

Comments are closed.