“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine
Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
Signs cafergot for sale of VF include an increase in breathing problems, swelling in order free zyprexa alternative withdrawal the feet, chest pain, and nausea and vomiting. It may zoloft overdose online purchase free stem from traumatic life challenges, existential doubts, and general dissatisfaction advair for order with how life is. Some pharmacies offer labels that have remeron for sale large print, braille, or a code you scan with a serevent no prescription smartphone to convert text to speech. "Inflammatory arthritis" is a zithromax no prescription broad term encompassing a diverse group of disorders characterized by clindamycin for sale joint inflammation. Therefore, the program a prospective student pursues will cheap clonidine tablet largely be a matter of individual preference. And the paperwork, find no rx cialis sometimes called the medication guide or patient package insert, may buy clozapine contain details about interactions. However, this article should not be cheapest estrace used as a substitute for the knowledge and expertise of a.
That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.
The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.