“Monstrous and Shocking” Music Downloading Fine
Monday, January 25th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
A cephalexin free delivery person should consider contacting a doctor if they experience symptoms without lipitor get prescription discount that could indicate endometriosis. Nuclear sclerosis is identifiable during a robaxin no prescription routine eye exam and is generally simple for an eye buy generic asacol side effects doctor, optometrist, or ophthalmologist to diagnose. In general, a doctor estrace online without prescription may recommend a laparoscopy for smaller cysts and a laparotomy clomid online stores for larger cysts or ones that may be cancerous. If diflucan online stores you and your doctor determine that Rinvoq is safe and order viagra without prescription effective for you, you'll likely take it long term. Of lumigan online stores note, these symptoms are not indicative of PLGA, as other discount xalatan medical conditions can also cause them. Practicing self-care is important aldactone without prescription for a person with Parkinson's disease as it can have zoloft overnight delivery a beneficial impact on symptoms and may also help a sale diclofenac person cope better with the day-to-day challenges of the condition. It.
That is the way appeals court judge Michael Davis described the $1.92 million fine levied on Jammie Thomas (now Jammie Thomas-Rasset) for illegally downloading 24 songs using Kazaa. This is the case we discuss in Chapter 5—Thomas was one of the only people who tried to fight the charges in court. That’s $80,000 per song.
The judge reduced the fine to $54,000, and apparently is unhappy that he couldn’t reduce it further, saying, “This reduced award is significant and harsh [but is] no longer monstrous and shocking.” This may still ruin Thomas, but suggests that the judiciary itself may scold Congress about the absurdity of the present statutory damages structure for copyright infringement.