Although real synthroid without prescription more studies are necessary, research shows that self-care strategies may buy petcam (metacam) oral suspension online help people maintain a balanced mood and prevent escalation into buy cheap retin-a alternative mania. This is part of the brain that processes visual, advair for sale spatial, and other sensory inputs to coordinate and plan movements. buy viagra no rx Alternative tests may be used to detect the parasites, but buy cheap bentyl they may show negative results because symptoms can develop years buy cheap estradiol internet after the initial infection. However, pronounced mood, personality, and cognitive order amoxicillin low price drugs function changes often appear during the middle or moderate stage buy generic prednisolone of dementia. While skin care can help to prevent or cheapest remeron reduce these changes, individuals should consider speaking with a dermatologist cheap dexamethasone if they experience skin changes during this time. The disruptive effects.

Let’s see.

1) A cartoonist in Denmark is nearly killed for drawing some pictures of a guy with a beard.

2) In Ireland, a law took effect banning blasphemy. A person can be found guilty if “he or she publishes or utters matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion.” By that standard, the cartoonist would have been guilty, I imagine. Some atheists are challenging the law; other parties are taking it as a model to be urged upon the U.N. Actually, the UN Human Rights Council had already voted to condemn the “defamation of religions.”

3) In India, just as in China, Google is cooperating with the law by censoring politically objectionable content. In this secular democracy, the line between religious and political speech is thin, and the fears of mass riots are real.

“If you are doing business here, you should follow the local law, the sentiments of the people, the culture of the country,” says Gulshan Rai, an official in the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, who is overseeing implementation of the new law. “If somebody starts abusing Lord Rama on a Web site, that could start riots,” he said.

Note the pattern here. The first case would be an easy call for many Westerners, but the other two plainly involve friendly democracies suppressing a wide variety of speech that most Americans would take for granted as constitutionally protected. I wonder if the U.S. is going to become an outlier state in this way also, or if the strong conservative religious forces in the U.S. will start persuading legislatures to chip away at free speech rights in the name, ironically, of respect for differences.

4) On the good-news side, not only does opposition video footage continue to get bootlegged out of Iran, but film-making culture continues to thrive through underground distribution networks.

Will digital control or digital liberty be the more powerful force in the next decade? I’m betting on liberty, but it sure isn’t going to be obvious.

This entry was posted on Monday, January 4th, 2010 at 4:59 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.