Swan estradiol discount neck splints can prevent the joints from moving beyond the get cheap buy online effects neutral position, while boutonniere splints can help straighten a finger internet in malaysia joint that a person cannot otherwise extend. According to the buy cheap online American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), total knee replacement typically cheap kenalog in canada involves four basic steps. There are various approaches to knee buying cheapest buy effects replacement surgery, including traditional, minimally invasive, and robotic-assisted. In the cheap purchase cementless approach, a surgeon presses the implants on the bone, cialis pill and the bone grows onto the parts. Symptoms of inflammatory serevent for sale arthritis may worsen in the morning because resting overnight leads remeron without prescription to a buildup of joint fluid, which causes pain and buy generic buying prescription stiffness. According to the American Academy of Dermatology (AAD), treatment buy generic online is vital to manage the symptoms of PsA If someone cheap flovent in uk experiences joint stiffness in the morning, they might consider talking cheapest professional their doctor, particularly if this symptom interferes with their ability buy cheap atarax online to get ready or affects their mental health. In an interview.

Let’s see.

1) A cartoonist in Denmark is nearly killed for drawing some pictures of a guy with a beard.

2) In Ireland, a law took effect banning blasphemy. A person can be found guilty if “he or she publishes or utters matter that is grossly abusive or insulting in relation to matters held sacred by any religion, thereby causing outrage among a substantial number of the adherents of that religion.” By that standard, the cartoonist would have been guilty, I imagine. Some atheists are challenging the law; other parties are taking it as a model to be urged upon the U.N. Actually, the UN Human Rights Council had already voted to condemn the “defamation of religions.”

3) In India, just as in China, Google is cooperating with the law by censoring politically objectionable content. In this secular democracy, the line between religious and political speech is thin, and the fears of mass riots are real.

“If you are doing business here, you should follow the local law, the sentiments of the people, the culture of the country,” says Gulshan Rai, an official in the Ministry of Communications and Information Technology, who is overseeing implementation of the new law. “If somebody starts abusing Lord Rama on a Web site, that could start riots,” he said.

Note the pattern here. The first case would be an easy call for many Westerners, but the other two plainly involve friendly democracies suppressing a wide variety of speech that most Americans would take for granted as constitutionally protected. I wonder if the U.S. is going to become an outlier state in this way also, or if the strong conservative religious forces in the U.S. will start persuading legislatures to chip away at free speech rights in the name, ironically, of respect for differences.

4) On the good-news side, not only does opposition video footage continue to get bootlegged out of Iran, but film-making culture continues to thrive through underground distribution networks.

Will digital control or digital liberty be the more powerful force in the next decade? I’m betting on liberty, but it sure isn’t going to be obvious.

This entry was posted on Monday, January 4th, 2010 at 4:59 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.