Blown To Bits

Y2010?

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010 by Harry Lewis
The order acomplia sections below will discuss the various treatment options for sickle buy xalatan without prescription cell disease in more detail. Many people with sickle cell order xalatan disease can live a full and active life, especially if cipro sale they take action to reduce the effects of the condition. buy generic methotrexate SCA is associated with reduced life expectancy, along with an cialis overnight increased risk of comorbid, potentially fatal, diseases. The abnormal hemoglobin drops non prescription causes the red blood cells to harden, become stickier, and buy generic artane change shape to resemble a sickle. However, people with SCA cheapest prescription price still face reduced life expectancy and several possible complications that tizanidine without prescription can severely affect their quality of life. This can lead buy prednisolone to symptoms similar to those of sickle cell disease or pyrantel pamoate online stores complications such as rhabdomyolysis. People with sickle cell trait carry only.

The problems that were widely feared fro the year 2000 — computers failing to add 1 to 1999 correctly because they had been coded to use only two digits for the “year” field — have actually occurred, 10 years late. There have been two reports of software thinking the day after December 31, 2009 is January 1, 2016.

Some phones are showing 2016 dates on received text messages.

And some retail computer terminals are making the same mistake, causing them to reject customer credit cards with expiration dates prior to 2016.

What’s up? There is some speculation on Slashdot that (a) only the last two digits are being stored (“10” instead of “2010”), and then (b) the “10” is somehow being interpreted as hexadecimal rather than decimal (which would make it decimal 16).

Nothing is truly hard to imagine in the hearts and minds of a corner-cutting coder, but (a), in this day of cheap memory and with the Y2K problem still in our rear view mirrors, would be really dumb, and (b) requires imagining a really perverse data representation (encoding the decimal digits in successive 4-bit “nibbles”, and then forgetting that you’d done that and interpreting the fully 8-bit byte as a binary number).

Comments are closed.