Blown To Bits

DOJ to Court: Nix Again to Google Books Settlement

Thursday, February 4th, 2010 by Harry Lewis
Unless generic cheapest cheap another underlying cause may be present, healthcare professionals may consider order augmentin any instances of itchy skin in a person with kidney buy generic atrovent disease to be pruritis. People may use emollients that moisten buy generic cephalexin and soften the skin and analgesics that alleviate itching and betnovate online reduce pain. A healthy bladder is also able to empty discount cialis overnight delivery urine with a strong, continuous flow, without pain or blood cheapest colchicine online in the urine. People with IC will need to urinate buy of once daily far more frequently than the average person, during both day prednisolone no prescription and night. In most cases, treatment will help improve symptoms, buy generic discount prescription but it may take weeks to see symptom improvement. Following kidney.

The Justice Department objected strenuously to the draft Google Books settlement on antitrust grounds, and when Google went back behind doors with the Authors and Publishers to revise it, the DOJ’s objections were among those take most seriously in the revision. But the DOJ has just announced that it is still unhappy. The DOJ’s objections are very basic: “The [revised settlement proposal] suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking business arrangements that go far beyond the dispute before the Court in this litigation.” That sounds like a problem that is going to be hard to fix with some clever lawyering alone, and the reports don’t suggest that Google is interested in going back for another try at redrafting. So we may be nearing high noon, where Judge Chin just has to give the thumbs-up or thumbs-down on a matter of monumental importance to the world of books and of ideas. Stay tuned; February 18 is his date for the final hearing.

Comments are closed.