Eating sale discount erythromycin a diet high in fruits, vegetables, and lean meats and buy cialis avoiding trans-fat, fried foods, and sugary foods can help to order discount diovan online lose weight, reduce oxidization, lower cholesterol, and prevent diabetes. To order t-ject 60 learn about other mild side effects, talk with your doctor cheap viagra on internet or pharmacist, or view the drug's prescribing information. Weight stigma zoloft without prescription comes from the belief that one body shape or size discount t-ject 60 is inherently better than another — in terms of attractiveness, discount serevent health, cleanliness, morality, or a mixture. There are conflicting opinions cost allopurinol about the merits of steam inhalation alone, but some people order viagra lowest price dosage add extra ingredients that may have additional benefits. Thrombocytopenia-absent radius generic glucophage (TAR) is a rare genetic disorder associated with the absence of.

Marc Ambinder of the Atlantic reports an interesting theory of how the Chinese managed to penetrate Google’s security barrier, which should be about the best in the world. Very little of the attack was technologically novel, according to his source, University of Texas Computer Science Professor Fred Chang. The key steps were figuring out the names of key system administrators, and looking at their profiles on Facebook and other social networks. The attackers then masqueraded as social network “friends” of the sysadmins, tricking them to click on links that turned out to embed malware on their computers. From that point on the theft of passwords was easy. The masquerade required exploiting an unpatched security hole in Internet Explorer; we knew that part. But the sysadmins are presumably pretty sophisticated about suspect email, so getting the identities of their “Friends” was essential.

Of course, by Facebook’s new policy, there is no way to hide your Friends list. I wonder if stories like this one will put any pressure on Facebook to change that policy.

This is all speculation, Ambinder notes. But Chang used to have a high level job at the NSA, so it’s a fair guess he’s familiar with some of the tricks that cyberattackers have tried in the past.

The Justice Department objected strenuously to the draft Google Books settlement on antitrust grounds, and when Google went back behind doors with the Authors and Publishers to revise it, the DOJ’s objections were among those take most seriously in the revision. But the DOJ has just announced that it is still unhappy. The DOJ’s objections are very basic: “The [revised settlement proposal] suffers from the same core problem as the original agreement: it is an attempt to use the class action mechanism to implement forward-looking business arrangements that go far beyond the dispute before the Court in this litigation.” That sounds like a problem that is going to be hard to fix with some clever lawyering alone, and the reports don’t suggest that Google is interested in going back for another try at redrafting. So we may be nearing high noon, where Judge Chin just has to give the thumbs-up or thumbs-down on a matter of monumental importance to the world of books and of ideas. Stay tuned; February 18 is his date for the final hearing.