It purchase discount buy sale is these blood stem cells, rather than bone marrow itself, order discount kenalog online that are necessary for the treatment of blood cancers and canada buy other conditions. Donors should contact their local NMDP center for cephalexin australia specific details and to discuss donations with a healthcare team. get discount online This medication draws stem cells from the bone marrow, so gentamicin eye drops online stores the donor has more of them circulating in their blood. discount colchicine A healthcare professional makes an incision about a quarter of retin-a an inch in length on both sides of the pelvic buy gentamicin eye drops bone. However, the FDA has not yet approved this as augmentin without prescription an MS treatment, and it warns against undergoing any unapproved procedures.

Tamar Lewin of the New York Times reports that some state legislatures are showing some common sense about sexting. They are recognizing that it doesn’t make a hell of a lot of sense to prosecute a teenager on child pornography charges for snapping a cell phone photo of herself and sending it to her boyfriend. If the perpetrator is the same as the victim, it’s like prosecuting a failed suicide as attempted murder.

Legislatures are so often happy to have old laws applied to new technology as long as they expand the scope of criminality. Perhaps in these cases they recognize that the kids doing the sexting could be their own children — as many as 20% of teens may have done something similar. Nice to see the pattern reversed, and for the problem to be treated as one of education and parental responsibility. The criminal justice system is not the vehicle for fixing whatever is going wrong here.

Also on the child pornography front, Japan, which apparently does not take real child pornography very seriously, is cracking down on Manga (cartoon) child pornography. A weird inversion of values. The Economist reports that an American court recently convicted someone for possessing Manga child pornography, which I should have thought was hard to do in the US, given the emphasis on harm to the victim. Apparently the grounds are obscenity, which is still illegal, though rarely prosecuted, in the US.

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 21st, 2010 at 5:35 pm and is filed under Censorship and free speech. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.