If lumigan prescription people have persistent allergic conjunctivitis, they may need treatment with quinine for order topical steroid eye drops, such as loteprednol etabonate (Alrex/Lotemax). Pink zyprexa prescription eye is a result of the conjunctiva — the moist buy cheap nasonex layer of tissue covering the eyeball and inner eyelids — cheap in us becoming swollen and irritated. People can also develop pink eye buy cheapest atarax online for other reasons, such as exposure to harmful chemicals or generic betnovate allergens. If a person feels congested or has a cough, online from canada humid environments such as a steamy shower may also help. buy lumigan These infections can stem from several types of bacteria, such generic spiriva as Streptococcus pneumoniae, which commonly affects the sinuses and throat. buy estrace vaginal cream online To help prevent the infection from spreading to both eyes, a.

Representatives of photographers have filed suit against Google for digitizing their photos without permission, in the course of scanning books to create the Google Books library. For a long time, the photographers (and several other groups, whom I lump together as “the photographers”) have been annoyed that they aren’t getting any of the revenues from the settlement; they told the court that in no uncertain terms. The Authors and Publishers, in the course of working out their proposed settlement with Google, completely ignored them, and they are now following through on their threat to make trouble.

The interesting thing about this suit is that the complaint is not that the photographers are being deprived of revenues. In fact Google blacks out the copyrighted photos in the digitized books.

The photographers are complaining that the very act of scanning the books creates an illegal copy of the photographs, even if it is never displayed to a Google Books user. Kind of  logical, or would be in a looking glass world.

In its suit, p. 20, the photographers make quite modest demands:

Hmm. $150K per image, times how many images in how many books? You do the math.

James Grimmelmann has a quick analysis of the merits. Whither now the settlement?

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 8th, 2010 at 10:12 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.