Knowing buy free celexa a person's status before sex is important for preventing the get buy transmission of STIs, fostering responsible sexual behavior, and promoting sexual t-ject 60 without prescription well-being. If the sexual encounter carries a risk of unintended best price for amoxicillin pregnancy, they also may consider emergency contraception such as the buy cheap acomplia online morning-after pill or copper IUD insertion. Make sure the penis buy online internet is fully erect.For someone with an uncircumcised penis, the CDC cialis professional recommend pulling back the foreskin before application. After having sex cheapest buy online without a condom, there are steps a person can take generic lumigan cheap to help prevent or get ahead of these circumstances. These cialis us symptoms can affect a person's physical ability to engage in buy cheap best online canada sexual activity and can impact the rigidity and duration of erections..

Representatives of photographers have filed suit against Google for digitizing their photos without permission, in the course of scanning books to create the Google Books library. For a long time, the photographers (and several other groups, whom I lump together as “the photographers”) have been annoyed that they aren’t getting any of the revenues from the settlement; they told the court that in no uncertain terms. The Authors and Publishers, in the course of working out their proposed settlement with Google, completely ignored them, and they are now following through on their threat to make trouble.

The interesting thing about this suit is that the complaint is not that the photographers are being deprived of revenues. In fact Google blacks out the copyrighted photos in the digitized books.

The photographers are complaining that the very act of scanning the books creates an illegal copy of the photographs, even if it is never displayed to a Google Books user. Kind of  logical, or would be in a looking glass world.

In its suit, p. 20, the photographers make quite modest demands:

Hmm. $150K per image, times how many images in how many books? You do the math.

James Grimmelmann has a quick analysis of the merits. Whither now the settlement?

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 8th, 2010 at 10:12 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.